Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp302918ybg; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:31:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+kHRXflwb2rGM/iizT7O/jp9rXJDTBokecJej0lmBVxbCvR18twA5NzVM+iabf7CDWqw8 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da4c:: with SMTP id w12mr25451551eds.122.1595943076315; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:31:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595943076; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FHD2XpZPTngkfnw+Op0ORx/c1e1nFLT/IPVzXAeR8YYXYEkaHbEWntuknbJWMFKQqc ujrcCbCuND5OYXMWcBYtkrxS4ItcfzKN9QkVak/FAsqG104YwwWkoftgdbq5jDJWcD5n VamUoyBf1UvCqKbynhW+/BWbC4929Q50CBdnwTLJRMJ0qvubgDy0t0Jb7fOxTX/8IeXB IvrfFdyLGvqJ9aA7lBHprf5rEBzwJ53mTh06/DkodN6oUJ3ox/wK7+zwKclIy/HMuJFS wJNRDLLajVl6H/DQ+vuGZF+s333tthASx2OjsGGYLmh+qKimug2ABeOivmSFu6HHSKeo 0WSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=QE2vYbeMyaiyVdDlGSxLVpdIeoiQ0sqIn4+NQZPZO7o=; b=lHG2jDQozg9WwT2MK4pmvuBrP8NkT3rvW3DhJCi/4IvoWyY8YtUxGyXUologECUxZ7 01SGc47C+Z9aQ+373czCS8pKTeqElDJHl9crlvlQ80OWvIWRbFBYzcHwSNThRgRU+B7D MEBvaOaiJ13aFmncNKSnwewqSP8QJaOzZO8vxcNg2JUNw+C8q3sXVLRKPXlFT9q5VMkH xH2KHifGPufdC7oyuJze4LiGWwvHpNBzuaUdILJSwWBTNpJDOl5wndn0sBvNi3t5xlx8 2v3MhOoUqOcu8r1mkx8JGPvB+1DOXhuV+b/vo0HFWOZHbBb5vzQ7L3AiVQffh+Sy2tut CsSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h27si8397264ejd.616.2020.07.28.06.30.41; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 06:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730067AbgG1N3z (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:29:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38378 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729044AbgG1N3y (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:29:54 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B832B67A; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:30:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Daniel Wagner To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner , Ming Lei Subject: [PATCH] block: Use non _rcu version of list functions for tag_set_list Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:29:51 +0200 Message-Id: <20200728132951.29459-1-dwagner@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org tag_set_list is only accessed under the tag_set_lock lock. There is no need for using the _rcu list functions. The _rcu list function were introduced to allow read access to the tag_set_list protected under RCU, see 705cda97ee3a ("blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list") and 05b79413946d ("Revert "blk-mq: don't handle TAG_SHARED in restart""). Those changes got reverted later but the cleanup commit missed a couple of places to undo the changes. Fixes: 97889f9ac24f ("blk-mq: remove synchronize_rcu() from blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set()" Cc: Ming Lei Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner --- block/blk-mq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index e32cb0217135..14ee7506f32f 100644 --- a/block/blk-mq.c +++ b/block/blk-mq.c @@ -2792,7 +2792,7 @@ static void blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set(struct request_queue *q) struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set; mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock); - list_del_rcu(&q->tag_set_list); + list_del(&q->tag_set_list); if (list_is_singular(&set->tag_list)) { /* just transitioned to unshared */ set->flags &= ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED; @@ -2819,7 +2819,7 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, } if (set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED) queue_set_hctx_shared(q, true); - list_add_tail_rcu(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list); + list_add_tail(&q->tag_set_list, &set->tag_list); mutex_unlock(&set->tag_list_lock); } -- 2.16.4