Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor
To:     James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc:     kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
        x86@kernel.org
References: <aefc85852ea518982e74b233e11e16d2e707bc32>
 <20200728131050.24443-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
 <3fd22f92-7f45-1b0f-e4fe-857f3bceedd0@schaufler-ca.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.21.2007290300400.31310@namei.org>
From:   "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <a909e0b0-0d82-d869-fe49-cc974680ac23@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:08:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2007290300400.31310@namei.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 7/28/20 12:05 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>> You could make a separate LSM to do these checks instead of limiting
>> it to SELinux. Your use case, your call, of course.
> It's not limited to SELinux. This is hooked via the LSM API and 
> implementable by any LSM (similar to execmem, execstack etc.)

Yes. I have an implementation that I am testing right now that
defines the hook for exectramp and implements it for
SELinux. That is why I mentioned SELinux.

Madhavan