Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 00:13:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 00:13:28 -0400 Received: from cx879306-a.pv1.ca.home.com ([24.5.157.48]:61430 "EHLO siamese.dhis.twinsun.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 00:13:19 -0400 From: junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com To: Tim Waugh Cc: bill davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Re: linux-2.4.12 / linux-2.4.13 parallel port problem In-Reply-To: <20011024230917.H7544@redhat.com> <20011025165226.T7544@redhat.com> <7vofmuu9d7.fsf@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com> <20011026104125.Z7544@redhat.com> Date: 27 Oct 2001 21:14:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20011026104125.Z7544@redhat.com> Message-ID: <7vbsiss8o2.fsf@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "TW" == Tim Waugh writes: TW> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:51:48AM -0700, junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com wrote: >> >From the original poster's description, 2.4.10 claimed to have >> detected both address and irq for parport0, while 2.4.12, >> according to the your response, could not tell that IRQ=7. Do >> you mean that the logic which made 2.4.10 to claime to have >> detected IRQ=7 was faulty and the logic in 2.4.12 is being >> careful not to misdetect? TW> Oh, I see. No, this is a regression. Please try this patch: Thanks. It (actually 2.4.13-ac2) does seem to fix the problem for my laptop. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/