Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp1181161ybg; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:48:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkqxmq6GJMKcNVBbTlsxptfkxXwkRdyKCAnnZywsW587kpElTEOA3yKKXokz24f0UJrkMT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31c8:: with SMTP id f8mr29639763ejf.269.1596034137848; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:48:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596034137; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aPC/g1Gao6g3oCYVq+j4rFM4rONXedCO6awVCCBhxJVKCb9qP5QOrC8a6aYiTKlyVF kpMpKLpvJonWz9f8AafMD2SJWAIw7duvi92r+t5T7a3QJwKs78MVssgTy1f05qfwn7wx bUe3bQgW4aoPZrSP9EXAsEGBKGzBYfn0aQJxufd7E9USiVaI5ozp85qa/zCdWE6KfB9I Rm5gXaTR/D6uuIVBYBrWdCOQoZBNBYYsm3cqPPVKW0qj6OP+AOE1rs2NFa8xfEqJEiwS LdzVovz4YFO/jT94f3WZ5Hz44wTflO0qwQnJBH+lTJk3iGxNkzNqtZ5QTVHYFQZGfiDb Uglg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=3iyFpM5/BXg/ovW1sf4meruZ9t5/ZCB/YXrufU01eIM=; b=sB3J6hkKOdoZWkTIQ8wyE+m+UhsaOgnFo4fjTXnKv/+xf0/kqw4B8XPBFm0utZ1gc+ lx1IjS4AwP+gtR5IHJMaKB/rOVemVyyg48hb9ErbVc5wcb8jKhBA3sV65ax97Ea/PEn/ vppp8MgTqOT/ymwbCt9ScJ/EyzL//iE8pl4aRpTonZCwPVjdi3Tw+MmyqybDzRPPBN1Z LFH2zIRsjz1RJ5LdImBzxEgapFQWbZ7CuXgG1DXi+GIKjYVp42R4qWW6uv0udYGuX598 AJNcAEmMJhMi9H9Jm//b5hbgxIgZqfh5saoXlLPV2nYc6RBE1r17y3WJeRpLI1h5ZrHK 1BPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@raspberrypi.com header.s=google header.b=dEkb4hGG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=raspberrypi.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k18si1159597ejp.753.2020.07.29.07.48.35; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@raspberrypi.com header.s=google header.b=dEkb4hGG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=raspberrypi.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726502AbgG2OqQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:46:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33948 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726353AbgG2OqP (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:46:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com (mail-wm1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 481E4C061794 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id p14so2978051wmg.1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raspberrypi.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3iyFpM5/BXg/ovW1sf4meruZ9t5/ZCB/YXrufU01eIM=; b=dEkb4hGGoi60zjTJt0jGB+G3PDfjSdeL573SQ9ZlTLlJpbzG1mvzCSBPrSHaxFWnHq wesmd8C4xEWXcwAD1Ofb4i9NEiD0kjobimkh8lNMT9P7zphud59M7gvsf8rI5o+/IJSU MrAngD03i3HCsyt1Txo66Vf05UVhTcKOoix5sObcfZxIe1Lu0X16HuAqOm7PFHcOyyn9 IlFo3DYouLlgCOXmEcZXqNVlVopPHNoQptmn8p1/GsNEbwE2oXZFBGVupjZCh3ouCWrD x01FzIMzGrNJkedjSqdos6FURUez3YonBiw2dRVOvO/TXWYZG67ueiYM2ONC0XXo2vJL axcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3iyFpM5/BXg/ovW1sf4meruZ9t5/ZCB/YXrufU01eIM=; b=udrS6ZrfqgFGTF0e84LtW8VjIzIpmO/JoYT3KMtl6TMhfwVW409I5jANm9DFGPfi4v UVRwPn9Y+gjcn1YICSO8Nj8kDQbbbpRrTHGS7vbfdCKr+SS9Cyp9ZVC+fgNT5czbLUPF 0F0u0ljEcdBayGMLIlHyJ2syiNsBsmf7vMy1HuGdZIWGCOoIbE8ediihaV1setd1n2fM T0YhiISfe01+rRu3tbBR3xmyrFPEz1QS6WjhMKnJBkjMH0i5Dl5nw9CNecfggjfKK4TW gSEvIrrHNIVNWlhh7VSDShHQbSIXlHpsyFuwqqQnm3EXrqAHPPiC+NZIbu8bNe2Id47b OO8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hB6Y+F9o4nuLKCiAJqnUYKNEnZrvc09xzgfKXtrCwvrtsJb5K Fgsm7CtCL7msIYitaOBSVw0SlOXB8zKd1Fa0a8wHxg2UAaU= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d52:: with SMTP id d79mr6877815wmd.82.1596033973615; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:46:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200729144251.us6a2pgkjjmm53ov@gilmour.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200729144251.us6a2pgkjjmm53ov@gilmour.lan> From: Dave Stevenson Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:45:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 29/78] drm/vc4: crtc: Add a delay after disabling the PixelValve output To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Eric Anholt , DRI Development , linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Tim Gover , Phil Elwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 15:42, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:09:21PM +0100, Dave Stevenson wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 18:43, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > In order to avoid pixels getting stuck in the (unflushable) FIFO between > > > the HVS and the PV, we need to add some delay after disabling the PV output > > > and before disabling the HDMI controller. 20ms seems to be good enough so > > > let's use that. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c > > > index d0b326e1df0a..7b178d67187f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c > > > @@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ static void vc4_crtc_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > ret = wait_for(!(CRTC_READ(PV_V_CONTROL) & PV_VCONTROL_VIDEN), 1); > > > WARN_ONCE(ret, "Timeout waiting for !PV_VCONTROL_VIDEN\n"); > > > > > > + mdelay(20); > > > > mdelay for 20ms seems a touch unfriendly as it's a busy wait. Can we > > not msleep instead? > > Since the timing was fairly critical, sleeping didn't seem like a good > solution since there's definitely some chance you overshoot and end up > with a higher time than the one you targeted. Fair enough. I know timing is "entertaining" around some of the 2711 pipeline setup. Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson