Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp1183692ybg; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:52:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfbGdcyYCkXLoRs0w16eHAQttQPo/fJjRRYpjiCxC/l14rs5End184/aNa91aR2D4IMacr X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c6c3:: with SMTP id b3mr5720434eds.215.1596034378951; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:52:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596034378; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TVweAIzBm4eLgKsJu9e0/AXBBxMcmRKaGrvl5Ui1aTt0piipzgpz8gDevt2B7S0DVV XMv5/40cz3PMH2J/DQW/nbvlWmjpXTf/3WNoVvXkY31cxlrU5+YLv2oW8VNSk/93iLqi fO9Z2B/uD2XcAjdl4Yd/vvwZyeBUssyJECLGOQpLbvRjhq9BLtcbUbwGAHbD2lHAP+u/ i6fA1boJzsCPiYo3jtcWoEBFd40jbYUaT7O4pj7B2MEEqVuAP0CkqeqiL6VLw8h26omr VwGxgWkKo9ufxBCxNmcEfumAwW7oye2tMlUxRsUFdUZnvDRQ1vmmTpbbY33C2m2FW3ex pqMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=sb3sZax11S8MQ3+REekT46bzAtkpROtksa+y+tRbvrA=; b=PdYU51nNKLdVDNAxoGbkeqROaJ9YCY9LHWhY/iMQ2mP6cdq7aJe3Zqx0lvK+xBWl73 UiYnrYfhNaePH5JWMHxNH15B0PJaSoJiv2TfKRncVclJ+W7u0SA3tlOUtfxLPyov3D/g wbLBJO0jZqJ2cvRxkSUkiv2pATB7/qMpMCnsXHLbVGj0iDoSbdor0hc0y4Hqqnje0D2L KtUvkr4vmyuas8vFWaGvRbpqoEL9cbQS0Anm4ud2rLk6km10IL9UhGEfJFY2Qj3LdM0C jv5MRzBiCnDYYBQi9oi+zUFdhzvA910iC4hZsQkmeDnTnWrg3DGx2/iFU9zV3Ho5E9Lr yDxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k18si1159597ejp.753.2020.07.29.07.52.36; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726806AbgG2OuF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:50:05 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55809 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726385AbgG2OuE (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:50:04 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 06TEnogx007443; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:49:50 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 06TEnnwb007440; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:49:49 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:49:49 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Vladis Dronov Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix function annotations to avoid section mismatch warnings with gcc-10 Message-ID: <20200729144949.GF17447@gate.crashing.org> References: <20200729133741.62789-1-vdronov@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200729133741.62789-1-vdronov@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:37:41PM +0200, Vladis Dronov wrote: > Certain warnings are emitted for powerpc code when building with a gcc-10 > toolset: > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x377c): Section mismatch in > reference from the function remove_pmd_table() to the function > .meminit.text:split_kernel_mapping() > The function remove_pmd_table() references > the function __meminit split_kernel_mapping(). > This is often because remove_pmd_table lacks a __meminit > annotation or the annotation of split_kernel_mapping is wrong. > > Add the appropriate __init and __meminit annotations to make modpost not > complain. In all the cases there are just a single callsite from another > __init or __meminit function: > > __meminit remove_pagetable() -> remove_pud_table() -> remove_pmd_table() > __init prom_init() -> setup_secure_guest() > __init xive_spapr_init() -> xive_spapr_disabled() So what changed? These functions were inlined with older compilers, but not anymore? Segher