Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932136AbWELPbk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932140AbWELPbk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:40 -0400 Received: from duch.mimuw.edu.pl ([193.0.96.2]:46467 "EHLO duch.mimuw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932139AbWELPbk (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:31:39 +0200 From: Tomasz Malesinski To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Segfault on the i386 enter instruction Message-ID: <20060512153139.GA4852@duch.mimuw.edu.pl> References: <20060512131654.GB2994@duch.mimuw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 592 Lines: 15 On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Handling it like you expect would require to disassemble > the function in the page fault handler and it's probably not > worth doing that for this weird case. Does it mean that the ENTER instruction should not be used to create stack frames in Linux programs? -- Tomek Malesinski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/