Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:11:28 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq
 core
Message-ID: <20200730034128.k4fmblfuwjcmqdze@vireshk-mac-ubuntu>
References: <20200722093732.14297-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
 <20200722093732.14297-2-ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
 <CAJZ5v0i5Xrk6oTt81aeXDi1F8gnEspJo9e6nGf10nSvBz-Dbkw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0i5Xrk6oTt81aeXDi1F8gnEspJo9e6nGf10nSvBz-Dbkw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 27-07-20, 15:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ionela Voinescu
> <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 036f4cc42ede..bac4101546db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -2058,9 +2058,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier);
> >  unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> >                                         unsigned int target_freq)
> >  {
> > +       unsigned int freq;
> > +
> >         target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
> > +       freq = cpufreq_driver->fast_switch(policy, target_freq);
> > +
> > +       if (freq)
> > +               arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
> > +                                   policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> 
> Why can't arch_set_freq_scale() handle freq == 0?

Actually there is no need to. AFAIU the freq returned by fast_switch
can never be 0 (yeah qcom driver does it right now and I am fixing
it). And so we can drop this check altogether.

-- 
viresh