Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp2021195ybg; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:27:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxlpNK8cdJmvpIaZBoWCmvGUHyIkDESHpwdTS1pzO1EikaaBj2X64uZYzQwHw1qJXUBh5u X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c213:: with SMTP id d19mr3300300ejz.291.1596122861980; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:27:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596122861; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bti6BSkCn0F9F0KR31K/oC1exPaQYPGQiBH3upvahqucbcQzMgu9m/7AhrBlws/E2a sfD+9OLPy+t5BVTUu1i/MPySr4G0o5YRjf2N1uNUMsEFKlZr8gCTnGGr+WUWwTZYK1tR KLS5cP5H4Xa7p4r5DYuqYI5dRNr7QDX7rmV7J/nTYoPVlyubuizPlHMoTjEV3SDkUYwz epEbRcOtaTzjDW+zexDFIRFHL2NWJgIgVbcyFjD3UrJTJwnBUuSzyPQzxXI2oFvqqOCD NqLxErsQMBuxNfa+SI/X7ObrAGMS9xsfyqbpoMy4IOLlentFrFtM1cLademT5KkyAX2F OfIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=sRBXteCx3iMxzf+5YFGiaHOZbhEeLZMnPLZMpPhN9j0=; b=X2cLsuesQE47JGkCw2RJklZFYB9oVSYg6gKPkIcJeScmgwcQ4SApUa5j4jCynJjd2T S1jic6CjRYh165JSGBlW9oNtdr6S4voOMBRowuv8Dvh8Gsm312deJ5jvkHvJQOefWW/Q NQ8xRl8+6fHkNDDfZNAX3xXeiWS7JFau+1jBDeWnJCD1JbPKNrCO5UMu9/YOGw64dTkQ vmHEBJhAZUvMqShYSekOIZH6NXO3sIT4SF6aNnmHb1VcNs/MEv8AUot1qf2KPH303foa xNtAN79sEqVuaUhM5UIaSTQsYnqrmCRmprz80N/g6s/viKYG1mIWGX5rwhZN/JvD3OVp bLdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mxpwHgVN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bo13si3398325ejb.104.2020.07.30.08.27.20; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mxpwHgVN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729633AbgG3P1B (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:27:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35858 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726275AbgG3P1A (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:27:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x643.google.com (mail-ej1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::643]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00980C061574; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x643.google.com with SMTP id jp10so1812127ejb.0; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:26:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sRBXteCx3iMxzf+5YFGiaHOZbhEeLZMnPLZMpPhN9j0=; b=mxpwHgVNXl7Gw3UA+uuDLTz10xKua5fw6rE++7C7vRni0IIjZ6gS+ZeYIhLWXHy3y/ vPMbGrVFEnb64IJ7Ca3gFuoT/t+e55dj9KYyxPjvaL0dq/2g+9XJh2GnXlC0ov5WrW4r Rvqv8Y35vB6EitcbM5ZUZxtNCnPnSsi+YFVcw1HHySKymFPJWeEa6sPbPdpt7WQI5ntw 79LeYQnXgJfuNWyhCcD0m8x5aI8aNo5PdMzhFVVC72vY5I6n+escxqqLBEbmJDJjhOQO 3MkVcanyh+4vYCe59GpVScPWSVS9yuFf0SgzR6ow2vry8MEcMN6ZbpjL2kclDSMFNJnZ Is8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sRBXteCx3iMxzf+5YFGiaHOZbhEeLZMnPLZMpPhN9j0=; b=AYYsYbelojyUQDED24MDNwkXIN4YnMHTTvHCGvYsHMekhgzoqT0PqPi24whMce8oNq vnN4OpWriADP/l6USfCQpXuXra7Nc+3GjNFPc2Ja3WM8BdzDXWWc0tpBE/MkZZ1dTBxm WNoUprDq2f5tHzk4msrpeE/t9BtlqiJMP7X2FrgDMb4O1oiv3wH1iOJ5IU6hbVLFAhG/ hnB9zP0WyJoHNjYOjBacq1fc17QnhrARjSCt9GF5f7D1I4D9zr8ERDKjStQdzSyGQoSk pv1qkG+NsSQY+j1RrNpvpZoPZuBvkY6Ec6PWnNx40z9tKMb7w3M2+1yPRuYNjLFR8R0e K9EA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wMvYd0rKRstQutmn40ZbsjlTz5jpYZPYuE3SMihPOhSTQwDP9 kTgnPbD5Rgyi5VVDwW9X6Jj8v7snL002dFiYaQc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:328d:: with SMTP id 13mr3192634ejw.71.1596122818624; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1594644106-22449-1-git-send-email-akhilpo@codeaurora.org> <20200720100131.6ux4zumbwqpa42ye@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> <20200721032442.hv7l4q6633vnmnfe@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> <20200722053023.vwaoj5oqh4cazzzz@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> <20200730051045.jejrtkor3b32l2qe@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> In-Reply-To: <20200730051045.jejrtkor3b32l2qe@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> From: Rob Clark Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:27:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for GPU DDR BW scaling To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Akhil P Oommen , freedreno , dri-devel@freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jordan Crouse , Sharat Masetty , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Matthias Kaehlcke , saravanak@google.com, Sibi Sankar , Jonathan , Bjorn Andersson , Dave Airlie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:10 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 22-07-20, 11:00, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 21-07-20, 07:28, Rob Clark wrote: > > > With your ack, I can add the patch the dev_pm_opp_set_bw patch to my > > > tree and merge it via msm-next -> drm-next -> linus > > > > I wanted to send it via my tree, but its okay. Pick this patch from > > linux-next and add my Ack, I will drop it after that. > > > > a8351c12c6c7 OPP: Add and export helper to set bandwidth > > Oops, sorry for the trouble but this needs to go via my tree only :( > > I maintain two different branches, one for OPP and another one for > cpufreq. There was no dependency within the OPP branch and so I > dropped it that day and asked you to take it. > > But when I tried to send a pull request today I realised that one of > the qcom patches in the cpufreq branch is dependent on it and I need > to keep this patch in my tree. Hmm, I've already sent my pull request to Dave, dropping the patch would require force-push and sending a new PR. Which I can do if Dave prefers. OTOH I guess it isn't the end of the world if the patch is merged via two different trees. BR, -R