Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp2079478ybg; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:48:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxR+nWuyCznSWta78pEkVN5ExnbeNUTT+A1YeEszPJikXpmVetlMi1/LiT0YYky+Kng6b+9 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d155:: with SMTP id r21mr3425753edo.87.1596127704476; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:48:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596127704; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XXqpQy2Wn2Yg/AVSloN+TUaFG7oN6rTKdVe00WskAVQlHV/UMKCHeIVBLYqtlwkxWn U4IyKi8fov+xX03DlcISUrw44v2uuVvGrMjVMpKaJ26mmp70er5cC3xrVnxo7CrWmd9h H3cI0ohv+lrYzd0YXFxRt64aExc9SSVRHbDwoM3jHHuHX6VOqHA132joF5aBjNs80r1j ipgyBRiRt0eICeyOHYyhl3D9a1IqHjkVbHC3QNCJF3tkyDzp6Q6hNeGNxt8ChkUW7vZr S+XINhroUvY/YHEPH+ahwANMTfHqr6MZiwEEcn8gYJapPngHenGFOuTu07YU/iZXntsE NiiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=Ej86RLhiH25iZDP4wdWxFB2UmXj5vFm/8QPxIezwAmw=; b=iKZHRjJOU5cfX5Zjhbt2fB57BKQ6iSJNScaINrlqAKLps2IstddLvj2gaylQob30/S 3EGVONQzZLJo2JhSD6QSCpThQRx+1nNL4d1nKjk9hNEIXR7Vxy4x0iaQrpgiFOch5pFS gR7eqx3XZxYyxxZBDSazQfLp8joX/nyxBqwZOfz8NGNNhS9In0VtDHogERKCBrFIm4vS 22HOQEcoxk7LYS1y+pMWthjMtj6CXz4sdV61TOItoRjKx4e9EOpcJA7i/reyflH/37M5 jYkllw/cSs/Ci6P9lQjm7sPy01RnED9YHlLSq9NaS+kE3viVNgY4qfHVK7Yr+PHEy+Jk 6+uA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com header.s=google header.b=YTk7AnLa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=broadcom.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h6si3032425edz.180.2020.07.30.09.48.02; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@broadcom.com header.s=google header.b=YTk7AnLa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=broadcom.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729979AbgG3Qp1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:45:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47954 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729885AbgG3Qp1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:45:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x444.google.com (mail-wr1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::444]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3C5CC061575 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x444.google.com with SMTP id r4so22575892wrx.9 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:45:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ej86RLhiH25iZDP4wdWxFB2UmXj5vFm/8QPxIezwAmw=; b=YTk7AnLaFlkL+C5U3ihsRpQI0XMJOdvkoUEWMS9jcSJYPJZwNBQDr6HcZ+wxr3xCaw AuAy4DSgV2DR6MQgxwofQT7xWRRUHdLTqDRgjutaTia7srGw7KXsio2BKdaK15EOYGL8 HNWPYs2SUOV5KARFWNpe9q41o1boLHHtcq1GQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ej86RLhiH25iZDP4wdWxFB2UmXj5vFm/8QPxIezwAmw=; b=OEV69DMQfzxvSp+eI/nHIBku1KBsC/a2aJ9v97nwFo8e5aazDI1CL5LoIeLiFX6Ixk JcAmTgUFXgNlm+JkMFT2C6yrv8fFHrEmxvxEy7vJ1jPOpLLk6rS1kW9Qd1q02irZaZ/f A9MbI03rpG3HFA/8YYIHhTpEcbKVJCETrVDNXSEdJ5wpImhYAa+m7CzzDYpXHTeVlt4G oCKvyX7bzK2KFGJEkKgpUITj/BRsJQHW8Hg7B58iGy9rvzVx7Tv+fhHz4/cP04+axqTz Jef4YozmTv5IFmdzvl5q0g8/OEvmRXkUmqmYLlDHK9jUp6DmX7QBw5PNa7UAtp2JMtsv 2Shg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533z7hxSNJTannbgze2lmIAnBI7zaBe8mwquFeD2bLc5foCz5DXi 4VZQFV5sw2Eu/J0QDNZiAGAPaP+U93GyJW36hP7QdZNVBLs0HA8tVnuOZcvBg9SJmrMlj+VAlRp MufvGrb5KXSTqu+j6DoyKDw8T6HoO4VChnmHqX9CQNAyw05ZMyZXutoM3/x8gPLGwOAPkMLDUDz IQ0kU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ee51:: with SMTP id w17mr36482383wro.239.1596127524535; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.136.8.246] ([192.19.228.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm10013589wrx.22.2020.07.30.09.45.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: iproc: Set affinity mask on MSI interrupts To: Mark Tomlinson , bhelgaas@google.com, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200730033747.18931-1-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <20200730033747.18931-3-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> From: Ray Jui Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:45:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200730033747.18931-3-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/29/2020 8:37 PM, Mark Tomlinson wrote: > The core interrupt code expects the irq_set_affinity call to update the > effective affinity for the interrupt. This was not being done, so update > iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity() to do so. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Tomlinson > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > index 3176ad3ab0e5..908475d27e0e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-msi.c > @@ -209,15 +209,20 @@ static int iproc_msi_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, > struct iproc_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > int target_cpu = cpumask_first(mask); > int curr_cpu; > + int ret; > > curr_cpu = hwirq_to_cpu(msi, data->hwirq); > if (curr_cpu == target_cpu) > - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; > + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE; > + else { > + /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ > + data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; > + ret = IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; > + } > > - /* steer MSI to the target CPU */ > - data->hwirq = hwirq_to_canonical_hwirq(msi, data->hwirq) + target_cpu; > + irq_data_update_effective_affinity(data, cpumask_of(target_cpu)); > > - return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK; > + return ret; > } > > static void iproc_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, > This change looks good to me. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Ray Jui