Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: remove WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE flag from unbound wq's
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@aol.com>, <linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Maksym Planeta <mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
References: <20200731024049.16495-1-hsiangkao.ref@aol.com>
 <20200731024049.16495-1-hsiangkao@aol.com>
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <0445e583-f9d6-782e-971c-a5a52dcdc6dc@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:48:24 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200731024049.16495-1-hsiangkao@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2020/7/31 10:40, Gao Xiang via Linux-erofs wrote:
> From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
> 
> The documentation [1] says that WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE is "meaningless" for
> unbound wq. I remove this flag from places where unbound queue is
> allocated. This is supposed to improve code readability.
> 
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/workqueue.html#flags
> Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta <mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
> [Gao Xiang: since the original treewide patch [2] hasn't been merged
>              yet, handling the EROFS part only for the next cycle. ]
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213141823.2174236-1-mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

Thanks,