Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200730214659.0fbfdfc4@canb.auug.org.au> <72b073ba-ee41-1a1c-ce6c-ffd8b5936b09@hisilicon.com>
 <20200731140842.46abe589@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20200731140842.46abe589@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:00:57 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvykg9Ly=tRXLrf4hvd4siYKAt5eM0EMnwMgqVDHnbVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 30 [build failure on arm64]
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 09:38, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote=
:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:46:52 +0800 Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.=
com> wrote:
> >
> > There's a build failure on arm64:
> >
> > In file included from ./include/linux/compat.h:17:0,
> >                  from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:13,
> >                  from ./include/linux/stat.h:6,
> >                  from ./include/linux/sysfs.h:22,
> >                  from ./include/linux/kobject.h:20,
> >                  from ./include/linux/of.h:17,
> >                  from ./include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
> >                  from ./include/linux/acpi.h:13,
> >                  from ./include/acpi/apei.h:9,
> >                  from ./include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
> >                  from ./include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
> >                  from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
> > ./include/linux/fs.h: In function =E2=80=98vfs_whiteout=E2=80=99:
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:1709:32: error: =E2=80=98S_IFCHR=E2=80=99 undeclar=
ed (first use in this function)
> >   return vfs_mknod(dir, dentry, S_IFCHR | WHITEOUT_MODE, WHITEOUT_DEV);
> >                                 ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:1709:32: note: each undeclared identifier is repor=
ted only once for each
> > function it appears in
> > ./include/linux/fs.h: At top level:
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:1855:46: warning: =E2=80=98struct kstat=E2=80=99 d=
eclared inside parameter list
> >   int (*getattr) (const struct path *, struct kstat *, u32, unsigned in=
t);
> >                                               ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:1855:46: warning: its scope is only this definitio=
n or declaration, which is
> > probably not what you want
> > ./include/linux/fs.h: In function =E2=80=98__mandatory_lock=E2=80=99:
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:2325:25: error: =E2=80=98S_ISGID=E2=80=99 undeclar=
ed (first use in this function)
> >   return (ino->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) =3D=3D S_ISGID;
> >                          ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:2325:35: error: =E2=80=98S_IXGRP=E2=80=99 undeclar=
ed (first use in this function)
> >   return (ino->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) =3D=3D S_ISGID;
> >                                    ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h: In function =E2=80=98invalidate_remote_inode=E2=
=80=99:
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:2588:6: error: implicit declaration of function =
=E2=80=98S_ISREG=E2=80=99
> > [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration]
> >   if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> >       ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:2588:32: error: implicit declaration of function =
=E2=80=98S_ISDIR=E2=80=99
> > [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration]
> >   if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
> >                                 ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:2589:6: error: implicit declaration of function =
=E2=80=98S_ISLNK=E2=80=99
> > [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration]
> >       S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> >       ^
> > ./include/linux/fs.h: In function =E2=80=98execute_ok=E2=80=99:
> > ./include/linux/fs.h:2768:26: error: =E2=80=98S_IXUGO=E2=80=99 undeclar=
ed (first use in this function)
> >   return (inode->i_mode & S_IXUGO) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode);
>
> Presumably caused by commit
>
>   b902bfb3f0e9 ("arm64: stop using <asm/compat.h> directly")

I have reverted this commit
  b902bfb3f0e9 ("arm64: stop using <asm/compat.h> directly")

and rebuilt arm64 failed due to below errors/warnings.

make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=3DTuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=3Darm64
CROSS_COMPILE=3Daarch64-linux-gnu- HOSTCC=3Dgcc CC=3D"sccache
aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc" O=3Dbuild Image
#
In file included from ../include/linux/stat.h:6,
                 from ../include/linux/sysfs.h:22,
                 from ../include/linux/kobject.h:20,
                 from ../include/linux/of.h:17,
                 from ../include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                 from ../include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                 from ../include/acpi/apei.h:9,
                 from ../include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
                 from ../include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
                 from ../arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
../arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:20:2: error: unknown type name =E2=80=98co=
mpat_u64=E2=80=99
   20 |  compat_u64 st_dev;
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:31:2: error: unknown type name =E2=80=98co=
mpat_u64=E2=80=99
   31 |  compat_u64 st_rdev;
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:34:2: error: unknown type name =E2=80=98co=
mpat_s64=E2=80=99
   34 |  compat_s64 st_size;
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:36:2: error: unknown type name =E2=80=98co=
mpat_u64=E2=80=99
   36 |  compat_u64 st_blocks; /* Number of 512-byte blocks allocated. */
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~
../arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:47:2: error: unknown type name =E2=80=98co=
mpat_u64=E2=80=99
   47 |  compat_u64 st_ino;
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:114:
arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1

- Naresh