Received: by 2002:a25:ca44:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a65csp2543196ybg; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:02:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyj+WdMqiuQYAVgFddkaG+p3A4kmIQbj4wYVBtw7XRzTN9q6zjTPAQKcpxYy2hqOv5JyCNh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1545:: with SMTP id p5mr2952955edx.388.1596189722629; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:02:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596189722; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Gh3VVEvqQiu7jgMhETDzYmYboD1//tZOxwpUl36lNhOTsc5BR4vVuoKtlH+tSwEVDO o7Dn1ZJV0OKVlJzoIDSYWLrK8Wam5HY50hIWweHQMMajfHxFMmdeKJWsvo9WDxxgETv1 jAWTexYG6UoerZUDUa3fz9ngJ8o+w0//DeylNIvJU7Xn8QtE06HvlSXjxnBU+kx9V3eC WqC9cMsOblMWxYcHbTx9UmgjSA/2aZre8nJ5xX85Ebk2UzmC5t2HQft6cHIpMKpMBbxP ZDySfC0C5S0+9VhuV+bhHXZ8VcCb1TOj3lG4K2aI3+x26piQB6s5rn7KcxUhg2MZ8WKP IgBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=NV0hvZDLmawNplZcqCGahm9Cp7sTrVBh57gRhoknpuM=; b=MGDoml6pW02eblnwEd0xmVPAq2x36c/OOAHOADNuJjEMHWITBEdNjAsTbYchcS8law WctpZWpiLrAF5mMRz/zuosQ4WdlRYz1KD/zyAg7y0yoqGFR1wOJMKwDEobMMdOzTj5PR yQaGOa7JFPdZjaaNjQOkSCODEyFicKlWn1/joW+RfRmmrEBR8LMLd1FQQtlmmAxUq+o3 xz0SvHI7jwl4vAXHu+uFiEqOdN9D4p7VLyShDMq6cAEgcRtoG8D8KYmmMD/2/dfRS+vT RZcIhTaPtxyOhv8Cq6dgf0GMoa+oXGvgVW/X5QpAIPy1bTxQ8UQD0LKtsMlCTmILNI2c q77A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y11si5050071ejd.313.2020.07.31.03.01.40; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732305AbgGaJ7C (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:59:02 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:28706 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732075AbgGaJ7C (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:59:02 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06V9X04r120632; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:58:47 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32md1yx1yw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:58:47 -0400 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 06V9XbOs121972; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:58:46 -0400 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32md1yx1y0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 05:58:46 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06V9sVYp000688; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:58:43 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32gcq0vch9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:58:43 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 06V9wffm64422364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:58:41 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811D2AE053; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:58:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B377AE045; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:58:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.vnet.ibm.com (unknown [9.126.150.29]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with SMTP; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:58:39 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:28:08 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev , LKML , Nicholas Piggin , Anton Blanchard , "Oliver O'Halloran" , Nathan Lynch , Michael Neuling , Gautham R Shenoy , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Valentin Schneider , Jordan Niethe Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] powerpc/smp: Implement cpu_to_coregroup_id Message-ID: <20200731095808.GB18776@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20200727053230.19753-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200727053230.19753-11-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87wo2k3yeq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wo2k3yeq.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-31_03:2020-07-31,2020-07-31 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=925 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007310071 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Michael Ellerman [2020-07-31 18:02:21]: > Srikar Dronamraju writes: > > Lookup the coregroup id from the associativity array. > Thanks Michael for all your comments and inputs. > It's slightly strange that this is called in patch 9, but only properly > implemented here in patch 10. > > I'm not saying you have to squash them together, but it would be good if > the change log for patch 9 mentioned that a subsequent commit will > complete the implementation and how that affects the behaviour. > I probably got influenced by few LKML community members who always add a stub and implement the gory details in a subsequent patch. I will surely add the change log in patch 9 about the subsequent patches. > cheers > -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju