Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 05:03:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 05:03:48 -0500 Received: from mailrelay3.inwind.it ([212.141.54.103]:467 "EHLO mailrelay3.inwind.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 05:03:35 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20011028110610.01fc3ae0@pop.tiscalinet.it> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 11:06:10 +0100 To: Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lorenzo Allegrucci Subject: Re: more devfs fun (Piled Higher and Deeper) Cc: Linus Torvalds , Richard Gooch In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 15.50 27/10/01 -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: >/me _seriously_ considers hostile takeover of the damn thing > >I mean, when holes are found at that rate just by cursory look through >the code... And that stuff had been there for at least 2 years. >Richard, I hate to break it on you, but dealing with that crap is >generally considered a maintainer's job. And it is supposed to happen >slightly faster - 2 years would be bad even for MS. If you don't >have time for that work - say so and step down, nobody will blame >you for that. Repeating that everything will be fine RSN is getting >real old by now... As matters stand I would suggest a radical approach: What about to replace the current devfs by a clean and lightweight ramfs based filesystem? IMO we need a complete rewrite and I'm sure we can make it simpler and cleaner. 2.5 stuff, but it's worthwhile. Just my 0.02 Euro, -- Lorenzo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/