Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200727122242.32337-1-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
 <20200727122242.32337-2-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> <CAHp75Ve-MyFg5QqHjywGk6X+v_F77HkRBuQsJ0Cx3WLJ5ZV43w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200731152201.GB10391@plvision.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20200731152201.GB10391@plvision.eu>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:02:47 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcS4fEak3z0exODErs5FbDwf+Di1RJmf7JfMgnD8xgXOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 1/6] net: marvell: prestera: Add driver for Prestera
 family ASIC devices
To:     Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>,
        Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@plvision.eu>,
        Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@plvision.eu>,
        Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@plvision.eu>,
        Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@plvision.eu>,
        Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@plvision.eu>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@marvell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:22 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 03:59:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:23 PM Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> wrote:

...

> > > Signed-off-by: Andrii Savka <andrii.savka@plvision.eu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@plvision.eu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@plvision.eu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@plvision.eu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@plvision.eu>
> > > Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu>
> >
> > This needs more work. You have to really understand the role of each
> > person in the above list.
> > I highly recommend (re-)read sections 11-13 of Submitting Patches.
> >
> At least looks like I need to add these persons as Co-author's.

I don't know, you are!
And I think you meant Co-developer's

...

> > > +#include <linux/string.h>
> > > +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> >
> > Perhaps ordered?
> >
> alphabetical ?

Yes.

...

> > > +       struct prestera_msg_event_port *hw_evt;
> > > +
> > > +       hw_evt = (struct prestera_msg_event_port *)msg;
> >
> > Can be one line I suppose.
> >
> Yes, but I am trying to avoid line-breaking because of 80 chars
> limitation.

We have 100, but okay.

...

> > > +       if (evt->id == PRESTERA_PORT_EVENT_STATE_CHANGED)
> > > +               evt->port_evt.data.oper_state = hw_evt->param.oper_state;
> > > +       else
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +       return 0;
> >
> > Perhaps traditional pattern, i.e.
> >
> >   if (...)
> >     return -EINVAL;
> >   ...
> >   return 0;
> >
> I am not sure if it is applicable here, because the error state here
> is if 'evt->id' did not matched after all checks. Actually this is
> simply a 'switch', but I use 'if' to have shorter code.

Then do it a switch-case. I can see that other reviewers/contributors
may stumble over this.

...

> > > +       /* Only 0xFF mac addrs are supported */
> > > +       if (port->fp_id >= 0xFF)
> > > +               goto err_port_init;
> >
> > You meant 255, right?
> > Otherwise you have to mentioned is it byte limitation or what?
> >
> > ...
> Yes, 255 is a limitation because of max byte value.

But 255 itself is some kind of error value? Perhaps it deserves a definition.

...

> > > +       np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "marvell,prestera");
> > > +       if (np) {
> > > +               base_mac_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "base-mac-provider", 0);
> > > +               if (base_mac_np) {
> > > +                       const char *base_mac;
> > > +
> > > +                       base_mac = of_get_mac_address(base_mac_np);
> > > +                       of_node_put(base_mac_np);
> > > +                       if (!IS_ERR(base_mac))
> > > +                               ether_addr_copy(sw->base_mac, base_mac);
> > > +               }
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       if (!is_valid_ether_addr(sw->base_mac)) {
> > > +               eth_random_addr(sw->base_mac);
> > > +               dev_info(sw->dev->dev, "using random base mac address\n");
> > > +       }
> >
> > Isn't it device_get_mac_address() reimplementation?
> >
> device_get_mac_address() just tries to get mac via fwnode.

Yes, and how is it different from here? (consider
fwnode_get_mac_address() if it suits better).

...

> > > +       new_skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
> >
> > Atomic? Why?
> >
> TX path might be called from net_tx_action which is softirq.

Okay, but GFP_DMA is quite a limitation to the memory region. Can't  be 32-bit?

...

> > > +       int tx_retry_num = 10 * tx_ring->max_burst;
> >
> > Magic!
> You mean the code is magic ? Yes, I am trying to relax the
> calling of SDMA engine.

Usually when reviewers tell you about magic it assumes magic numbers
whose meaning is not clear.
(Requires either to be defined or commented)

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko