Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:42:07 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangn1985@outlook.com,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: core: restore dpcm flags semantics
Message-ID: <20200731174207.GC4510@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20200723180533.220312-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
 <20200729154639.1983854-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com>
 <2ad13f95-434d-376a-bc38-b209623b461e@linux.intel.com>
 <1jft998jbe.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
 <936d6e37-0ad0-b0d7-814a-1ace12087746@linux.intel.com>
 <20200730185229.GH5055@sirena.org.uk>
 <1j7duj98wk.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1j7duj98wk.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:16:43PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:

> One last thing I'd like to understand. Is this behavior of throwing an
> error going to applied to the non-DPCM case as well ? so at least thing
> are consistent between both cases ?

> IOW:
>  * An error is now throw if dpcm_capture is set on the link and the CPU
>  DAI support playback_only

We should definitely complain about that.

>  * on non-DPCM links, will an error be thrown as well if playback_only
>  is not set and the CPU on the link happen to not support capture ?

I think we should move towards not needing to do that for DPCM.

--QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8kV+8ACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9B67Af+MxqJXiRcEr3b1wsfZYNzZAmN8zNYmZH8ubxUHrcXWUMDl5SAjY/+aEMq
JL+V4yKWh6qgn0fB5NoCNak05vKjZ12E3RpBZu7zN5q620XE3DXC45b+2pv91DCn
FBVrTazkRYfe2IOp2odw47F5Mfnd4x4yfiTuIgGgolmmC8uXeTIZ5TIUGzrPwKoX
aZESOyB5mglx21aMK4JqHah0Lo/fzYIxjdejoAG2yClR11CdHKgPxI6JQA6+/FQr
17Xx+Xd2pd4rhdOIJ91Shgmd5jIyroODzlU3k7PIiNPGeCMP7MlzwUv6ehBOPUGU
n+e6KyufvWAE7FCqi86jv6GQFhguPQ==
=9eeM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD--