Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932436AbWEMQgK (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 12:36:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932469AbWEMQgJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 12:36:09 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:39615 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932436AbWEMQgI (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 12:36:08 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data From: Mike Galbraith To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Florian Paul Schmidt , Darren Hart , lkml , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: References: <200605121924.53917.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <20060513112039.41536fb5@mango.fruits> <1147521338.7909.5.camel@homer> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:36:22 +0200 Message-Id: <1147538182.7562.2.camel@homer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 699 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:39 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Careful, rt21 has a bug slipped in that might have funny results on SMP > machines: > > + if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq])); > + set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]); > > John (although he later fixed it) added a ; after the if. But the fix is > not yet in Ingo's patch. I saw that go by, and fixed it before building. Mine is a UP build anyway. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/