Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750986AbWEMRRc (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 13:17:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750893AbWEMRRc (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 13:17:32 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com ([66.249.82.199]:61902 "EHLO wx-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWEMRRc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 13:17:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S3RFSS4pO1TH7NElevOQ82LYrlk2dng7Q3o3bjSC4a8BgzLutogivFxR8m8Ibi8XKkJG5TZ24UWvjgxs102Fr5WjBqolrk57V2HQHpS+Vx46t/k2W+LvxV/YAmUkcnRaoeQocSzqvK4mK9PuvtC+FrSF4T36+sEuAOvGKgSJQyQ= Message-ID: <2151339d0605131017v6fdda8edt334f43fb62e3f253@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:17:31 -0700 From: "Nathan Becker" To: "David Brownell" Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: USB 2.0 ehci failure with large amount of RAM (4GB) on x86_64 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200605122132.41410.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <2151339d0605032148n5d6936ay31ab017fbabc65b3@mail.gmail.com> <200605061232.52303.david-b@pacbell.net> <2151339d0605092237m4ef4e835k16b8c779f6ad7046@mail.gmail.com> <200605122132.41410.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 23 Thanks for the patch. However, did you not get my very last message? Checking back through my mail logs, I think it might not have been delivered. After claiming that the dma mask fixed the problem, I quickly discovered that the dma was not what did it. Thus the patch you sent does not work. But, here is what does: If I rmmod ehci_hcd and then modprobe ehci_hcd, it works, and I get full USB 2.0 speed. There must be something happening in the clean-up code of the the ehci_hcd that fixes whatever conflict I'm having. When I originally made that patch and then reloaded the ehci_hcd module to test it, I mistakenly thought that it was the patch that was fixing the problem. I should have tested more thoroughly before sending the e-mail, but I got very excited. Sorry about that. After several days of using the rmmod/modprobe workaround, I do feel confident that it is a legitimate fix. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/