Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1237120pxa; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 00:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxTXKL0oqlbFwOuaOuVSUabrjEqk73W7C5VUlZCcnRGeM6oewO8XFElFmQL06GR/gSCiPj7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c29a:: with SMTP id r26mr11141712ejz.153.1596352183762; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 00:09:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596352183; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dpnj8t+S8eQnjh+PWDzlfqFSa+Nf2nJjnQSBm6FrLVoH1zen5XbKer6pObXMxP5jQL e5klXWKDUQMk1R8pqAmH/GCX2fE0VmGxIyazQIz/2iISy0QCDvPCu7jp1FHwr5iVjUy7 1x8lUylmBMT7X0R8rpZBVUKTVWRg9b7Y90h8u39THeQwSYiFxJlXIU/PNVktuY3zmuRH Ld2G7OQwQZeJb+uKBzSF7lDXrLLdR3aEadi+YxMkv26wok94WUDpdVVIze6w4vZOtJup 03sf1NHEp+6DFkeVENPyFRgeBCOXgwVvI1Iv4pCy89PIx/yyFUpSIWtrIwc34MJoiXui Psxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=8HWeqXcAS7XS2PruAkhfeCjc7ySdOanUgF5dCaIiyCk=; b=WL4ccmuHT4pfu3Bmabdn5e68AXYkixCS09ktS/UfV4EHM36zzKs04f/yjP2vnhv4Uy +5GUBeWJnhi6n0IG4XEVMqxxTONHPeBszMjBEPeJwfSbylLxwlaEOHPRHyZme6JwyShR +aTkSPvELTELmC3NjHZ3dX5JEjDsg+Hr5irpcksOrTpuhtnqLqzKSbceiNSoayg9SsiC 7q0HFBeTvK38JlY+kdEaOsrLD2nlA+b+Y2Ekc5p0BE5o9Ae4UW8M8TMehKjtzIJPz1GG eMSCpJIG6lIry+RaHxA/hKAWfPy+GjXD1JwtfDZWHR3PJ5EeGnv0ftm9A9tvBRl+xTD/ tQWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d11si8203864edr.595.2020.08.02.00.09.21; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 00:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726796AbgHBHJH (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 2 Aug 2020 03:09:07 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:10315 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725880AbgHBHJH (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2020 03:09:07 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,425,1589234400"; d="scan'208";a="355791197" Received: from abo-173-121-68.mrs.modulonet.fr (HELO hadrien) ([85.68.121.173]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2020 09:09:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 09:09:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Markus Elfring cc: Denis Efremov , Coccinelle , Gilles Muller , Julia Lawall , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Nicolas Palix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] coccinelle: api: add kvfree script In-Reply-To: <3aea12cf-68dc-e140-936f-cfefb2adbc8f@web.de> Message-ID: References: <3aea12cf-68dc-e140-936f-cfefb2adbc8f@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-429177205-1596352144=:2531" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-429177205-1596352144=:2531 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 2 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote: > … > > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/kvfree.cocci > … > > +@choice@ > > +expression E, E1; > > +position kok, vok; > > +@@ > > + > > +( > … > > +| > > + E = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|krealloc\|kcalloc\|kmalloc_node\|kzalloc_node\| > > + kmalloc_array\|kmalloc_array_node\|kcalloc_node\)(...)@kok > > + ... when != E = E1 > > + when any > > + if (\(!E\|E == NULL\)) { > … > > Can the SmPL code exclusion specification be incomplete here? > > How do you think about to check also if the memory is passed to any function > (or macro) calls before the shown detection of a null pointer? It seems both extremely unlikely and not relevant to the question at hand. Passing E to another function will not change the value of E itself. Passing &E to another function could change E, but it would be very unusual to do that, and doesn't seem worth checking for. julia --8323329-429177205-1596352144=:2531--