Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964818AbWENA0x (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 20:26:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964822AbWENA0x (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 20:26:53 -0400 Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.94]:21132 "HELO smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964818AbWENA0w (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 20:26:52 -0400 Message-ID: <44667996.6090009@sbcglobal.net> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:28:06 -0500 From: Matthew Frost Reply-To: artusemrys@sbcglobal.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: http://advogato.org/article/888.html References: <20060513230206.GC12213@lkcl.net> In-Reply-To: <20060513230206.GC12213@lkcl.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1820 Lines: 44 (sorry; reply-all) Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > "Recently there has been a fuss over monolithic and micro kernels - > specifically the direction of the Linux Kernel development. Free > Software is about "freedom of choice", and we should be able to choose > to compile the Linux Kernel as either a monolith or a microkernel. " > > ... > I love your tasteful choice of writing your diatribe on your site and sending us a URL we can ignore. Didn't you cause this fuss last time? Does that actually qualify as recently? http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/10/2/89 You want another flame war? This sounds suspiciously like the kind of 'freedom' where you say you want something, and expect someone else to do the heavy lifting for you to get it. Read up on the actual freedoms involved in Free Software. They do not cover "Freedom to Be Provided With The Kernel Binary Design of Your Choice". You have the freedom to do with the kernel source what you wish, as long as everyone after you keeps like freedom. You want a linux-like microkernel, go for it. You have sufficient freedom, and sufficient coding ability if we believe your CV, to make it happen. Scratch your own itch. You don't have the freedom to dictate development practice to an existing development community with a longstanding project. This is not an itch Linus wishes to scratch, and, as you acknowledge, it is not the kind of change which will merge into mainline nicely. Quit complaining and do the work, or help other people do the work, since you know l4linux exists. No more diatribes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/