Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932203AbWENDqm (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 23:46:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932318AbWENDqm (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 23:46:42 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:5762 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932203AbWENDql (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 May 2006 23:46:41 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data From: Mike Galbraith To: Darren Hart Cc: Lee Revell , lkml , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Florian Schmidt In-Reply-To: <200605131601.31880.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> References: <200605121924.53917.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <200605131106.16864.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <1147544472.6535.294.camel@mindpipe> <200605131601.31880.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 05:46:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1147578414.7738.11.camel@homer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 693 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 16:01 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Saturday 13 May 2006 11:21, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > > 1 [softirq-timer/0] > > > > What happens if you set the softirq-timer threads to 99? > > > > After setting all 4 softirq-timer threads to prio 99 I seemed to get only 2 > failures in 100 runs. If you disable printf + fflush in iterations loop, problem goes away? -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/