Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2126331pxa; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:07:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyc1nQ6ZjraBXcli2qXYDOMD5jR3UWVpCmbMhzJ6fWqWApiURZD8wwPMMK5pfuq47j9/AvZ X-Received: by 2002:a50:ed84:: with SMTP id h4mr16334837edr.278.1596467273416; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:07:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596467273; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s9ObhIUlfkkKQmyOwR4BOUVzUkHMntBtPsummsBatRLLTujNJ1HDtTsLG70uue/rGq wAzHJfZwjJxEzWDBj5frr53pNy32h5UczSLPZOrFB6DjM3uRvWrVR3uqK+95S2rugBiO IXe53QDcOySpaLt85njIuFMZCPoFit4/Y+S7r/9ERd+xZ2qqe/MUcMs7QaZfu9Okgj24 Ve0IUvuB9VU/zjjgPwQRbT0V/xshY5e8QIhNvVR1TCCqdO0lRB8rWW5l9dklTyqdHI0Y AEAe6xswBEUrgRKkOgVu6fbA6krDeeBYJMwjHDFHZ/o+CFVP8k9ZynVRUSGJcqFG+EA1 wBcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=pjWdSXsdUxkBjjBVUP1FJ/6XL6tfG3B7HQZWOyNNJZU=; b=nwkQZ0Sclr+vjgQ5DwjDh0BpBfMTlnHTCul8kyjW+NTGQKbuk1OgO/AbgQcM6DeGwm LTFCDmxIhA7fX+jqYsljWYuxQ1PFgldfLPkmcc89q3F1NEX+BfwpStf8DauzXIOnslm/ JijYAhPsH0+70EXxQPaAWkGEwQR0FL8zR7NojX/wauHLFccq/Omm6mt93drF2gSVSbFv tKUgkfvk6XS+9w5MIz4lsAM3iQafCYRapE2N4wuJCh/+b1lf/bRW6GtLSx6kdqo8qLEF sXrLCc4htxjcEsQDuuLlMZ74U+lvLlU1bYeFNphRZb2rAEDt3RA4Ab3bke1csCwx8FsZ nNZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t17si10997034ejs.635.2020.08.03.08.07.31; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727064AbgHCPHH (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:07:07 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50020 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726276AbgHCPHH (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:07:07 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6737AB3E; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:07:04 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Alex Shi Cc: Hugh Dickins , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 00/21] per memcg lru lock Message-ID: <20200803150704.GV5174@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1595681998-19193-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <49d4f3bf-ccce-3c97-3a4c-f5cefe2d623a@linux.alibaba.com> <08c8797d-1935-7b41-b8db-d22f054912ac@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <08c8797d-1935-7b41-b8db-d22f054912ac@linux.alibaba.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 30-07-20 10:16:13, Alex Shi wrote: > > > 在 2020/7/30 上午2:06, Hugh Dickins 写道: > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Alex Shi wrote: > >> > >> Is there any comments or suggestion for this patchset? > >> Any hints will be very appreciated. > > > > Alex: it is now v5.8-rc7, obviously too late for this patchset to make > > v5.9, so I'm currently concentrated on checking some patches headed for > > v5.9 (and some bugfix patches of my own that I don't get time to send): > > I'll get back to responding on lru_lock in a week or two's time. > > Hi Hugh, > > Thanks a lot for response! It's fine to wait longer. > But thing would be more efficient if review get concentrated... > I am still too new in mm area. I am sorry and owe you a review but it is hard to find time for that. This is a large change and the review will be really far from trivial. If this version is mostly stable then I would recommend not posting new versions and simply remind people you expect the review from by a targeted ping. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs