Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2128201pxa; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJotYviVzMk8Yngb+QYBxTltziwcW0dL68KX9eljPwhsCy+WjRXYGujggVVvUzKiWmweu6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1756:: with SMTP id d22mr17008371eje.29.1596467400500; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596467400; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SfQczht8FAzc5CUy/TDJHvszoTSUXlbUyWiWAS73hAaC3lkIc9xVqxRNQ9fOt5WoaW px/m3qH23jky3aTvv5qXfSL/jCISPRIEgmWhvSLXqW4EZXksGfit+QT3vL50Q0yIBgIz DLmr5hLAyNQZWTG9oparpvEU2UAmHSAlQVKSM41Rwrn4UzhJl/nTWTxbmTmfdJtebjEn rvJzYMPPWuuU/LYKoc5+JFEUvVK8RmDTDjW8TaqZ2FexHVKrTWndFKF9hKdriofdR2Un CPz213VkkMut/fFW+bqi2fLUgAxVp4SlxH7vD8Tb3kZcw8dFOR45gF7i5wml0u2RFf4W 8BZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=tEXa+Nw0Vhpk1JPpmM63OlVDHxCPAd5Oy1ivU6a2UHM=; b=nDlIiT2LMtQ27GX0/vGHo9F1Uimew7/y06jZ+FBWLwNT4PBo9Sed7y6mmKMMD3BohK Nr0rHux7Fmuzj2gbUIeA3XBS4oC3gg8TWm+8y5i4G3Dy3taCeZpex1S76l7YnDVkcloE J2JicGQfxjcqAf13bxobsrxfzbWReE99phvou75tTWBaiX3Mmv/4tl1dMEdKg6PtuKTm A+8rgFixjKxeP5kcnqkOXDTYLYKHdbm33E1cS0Hdpa7/Az/xDhaGo90LDZzayESy14Qj ebFv/TagHg3G/Qe7CKxrrl36w30jPlUD6Lm06hUm8c2HRL/oGDkAABPtyE3+X29/flhm IGIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w13si10902224edu.248.2020.08.03.08.09.38; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727889AbgHCPJA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:09:00 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50398 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726276AbgHCPJA (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 11:09:00 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87089AF76; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:08:58 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Roman Gushchin , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Shakeel Butt , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/19] mm: memcontrol: decouple reference counting from page accounting Message-ID: <20200803150858.GW5174@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20200623174037.3951353-1-guro@fb.com> <20200623174037.3951353-6-guro@fb.com> <20200803090033.GE5174@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200803150349.GA502356@cmpxchg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200803150349.GA502356@cmpxchg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 03-08-20 11:03:49, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:00:33AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 23-06-20 10:40:23, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > @@ -5456,7 +5460,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page, > > > */ > > > smp_mb(); > > > > > > - page->mem_cgroup = to; /* caller should have done css_get */ > > > + css_get(&to->css); > > > + css_put(&from->css); > > > + > > > + page->mem_cgroup = to; > > > > > > __unlock_page_memcg(from); > > > > What prevents from memcg to be released here? > > ->attach_task() and kill_css() are exclusive through the cgroup_mutex, > so the base ref cannot disappear from under us during this operation. OK, is this worth a comment? Reference counting before other operation on the object always makes me worried and those details are hidden elsewhere. Btw. with the follow up fix from Hugh Acked-by: Michal Hocko -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs