Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964783AbWEOHWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 03:22:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964784AbWEOHWL (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 03:22:11 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56]:50402 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964783AbWEOHWK (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 03:22:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 03:21:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document futex PI design In-Reply-To: <20060513201402.68c2b205.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Message-ID: References: <20060510101729.GB31504@elte.hu> <20060513201402.68c2b205.rdunlap@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 869 Lines: 28 On Sat, 13 May 2006, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > + > > + > > +1) Has owner that is pending > > +---------------------------- > * insert blank line to be consistent > I didn't see this comment before. I purposely didn't add a blank line here, because it's not a new section. It's an index for the three cases that can happen. I didn't want to add the two blank lines so that people notice that its an index, but I still used the '-' to make it stand out. Have another idea on how to make these three stand out without making them look like new sections? Should I put a two or three space indent for the three? -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/