Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2437451pxa; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:30:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8NJGHB/epy6mKUAZ7IaWkoyuB+tlabTdbjidkK31aTTeXduDPZMS7hPMdP8TKjTanISkn X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1f08:: with SMTP id w8mr19702339ejj.535.1596497437893; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:30:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596497437; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PDHUAnrSbRU6HmwVmS/Y3mWxOWWcgeMtKymOqtdnX67i/wNPK7vOOWJ3/27Cod+pkQ PVHASxpP68vOmKyFPtlxX35m3023TMTRxJ3DKnBiFyNo3xwnxlg0645ddMRVTG49Hcfk HNBg2Mw+WB7c+c32JTCj6jrrK8VqzODlzVQPBKfmWgCyYQdeqDFYzd2qnxwrpkD4WO3U qoLw24utYrDLyLCuBC6r5j4sbIIsh7Aenl0QT06PZgUUaVFqn2ypJT10YGUIeh4R4H+6 2g1hzTm+NsEUb46s6feCPmJtOfFwAFUKpg339prFJ6nuJN4n5w6JU+rHWoJUH0cydnlL 9ztA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=XRm3NJEvomEDfGeZbbN2TL8ZG4riiX42sSsKVhTtCDg=; b=Am9vzFmaHZXGQ3g/qUEXROOi+iGDZzzvBJ4yNMOAJLJVGUfdNWs4VTRtUroMmnBDQ1 VxAFJUdWQ65IpVWCyLQrTr63fs3tmq5pln2n0KSfPQuFcjXq6vfF7ShMvcRkeeWd2YNr mo4z4pnWDb6p+iOG9KhsGmjFlS9phJUbNmbQeoi1tgefb3y7rdWzbLgB79RRHuvEOhIo dqJHHeqltojA7Zv3kdA5651n7PHvZ+SKx3+olZqO9T6byH3hrvQGJ5gqjC4ZoAsqiCsC b/P0jtd5E8zZvmQCpgskBX6SJevhQd8QBTOCJtlRMpbNEejO8jJyC17reHbHM9chdtFa 8Yzw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Fr+M+UIi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l14si11100433ejz.730.2020.08.03.16.29.54; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Fr+M+UIi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729175AbgHCX3q (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:29:46 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:42781 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727091AbgHCX3p (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:29:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596497383; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XRm3NJEvomEDfGeZbbN2TL8ZG4riiX42sSsKVhTtCDg=; b=Fr+M+UIixqInbx9UFT+Jl0PMuqZuYm2VlEQ66k7p0FOWCLV8sGPRdHRVWb7m99HhKZSdUs Fxkvnrj/mDbXml3/izLH6VaDQrNAJ0+SGGECsLWjRPEp9e/WO1vs5V16d3oR23aCIplaYJ ConoecJqaG5k+XlgDSPG0af/nGVapOg= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-157-4IIAOs0wNEqmeePJInIJUg-1; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 19:29:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4IIAOs0wNEqmeePJInIJUg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id j14so2736240edk.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:29:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XRm3NJEvomEDfGeZbbN2TL8ZG4riiX42sSsKVhTtCDg=; b=OXYm3QvSE9cm5r8OkwO434ahfrCKzzSE+HhUN2+/DCbdZ+MJIdQp0kO5tWBs337Oxr Yq73O9PdKuAh2BSlKGBbeEfk5X0czxviLUm8l19DSfGP/Mqq5SeRqDs5K02ds6FU7q6Z k51TfldjHk1TkLYdrXrA5bQfbf8+rOBxeOKGHxjQnU+0tx3NNca3sbB9IiRdW6vzyEV3 Y7w9EU9rujtaxYx9ZZcd+9KvIZWJhWns+Cy61ixJq0ON37l/8JYSMDP/bx9+mYxseGdN d5fb6RDH0dcNGse7MLsnWcO+Awl7HFtb+bGbvYuR4tp13FJX9vFb2CfwITgfiC/MxXUg mxqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530M38a+wkOHKy6zAj+VxTd3flB3V5HK8yDQiew9EaZW/7djXK1v p+2d4Dr7WU63YhF218CffgjxeXfXROJs2+2//t28gLoqkJOjK6VvSEW1uKp2EOH6DADhpLK3+03 qyLRsflb4GF6YEmtN+4IM/UgkKnKboU6kZX4ClBPN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1104:: with SMTP id h4mr18840732eja.456.1596497381273; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:29:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1104:: with SMTP id h4mr18840718eja.456.1596497381059; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:29:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200730192110.1466e63e@canb.auug.org.au> <20200730120303.GQ19097@mellanox.com> <20200803231923.GR19097@mellanox.com> In-Reply-To: <20200803231923.GR19097@mellanox.com> From: Ben Skeggs Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:29:30 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hmm tree with the drm tree To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Ralph Campbell , Stephen Rothwell , Dave Airlie , DRI , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:19 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:31:45AM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > > > > On 7/30/20 5:03 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 07:21:10PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the hmm tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c > > > > > > > > between commit: > > > > > > > > 7763d24f3ba0 ("drm/nouveau/vmm/gp100-: fix mapping 2MB sysmem pages") > > > > > > > > from the drm tree and commits: > > > > > > > > 4725c6b82a48 ("nouveau: fix mapping 2MB sysmem pages") > > > > 1a77decd0cae ("nouveau: fix storing invalid ptes") > > > > > > > > from the hmm tree. > > > > > > > > 7763d24f3ba0 and 4725c6b82a48 are exactly the same patch. > > > > > > Oh? Ralph? What happened here? > > > > Ben did email me saying he was planning to take this patch into > > his nouveau tree and I did reply to him saying you had also taken it > > into your tree and that I had more nouveau/SVM patches for you on the way. > > So, I'm not sure what happened. > > Well no answer from Ben and it looks like it is in the main DRM tree, > so I will drop the 4725c6b82a48 patch from hmm. My apologies, both for this slipping past me, and for the trouble. I did mean to drop that patch from my tree before sending it on to Dave. Ben. > > Jason >