Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp32220pxa; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:46:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPcmi0TQ99+BOBtaODZPXlwn0aTkGg/HRLYLy+OxvzQBm5Od9SiMXeX9d28IXqKalMUXlp X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a081:: with SMTP id q1mr18862618ejy.499.1596516361625; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 21:46:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596516361; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nJCEnfsOlLpoXqaSxMd4q6wVgFbSa/OVyuOGkJLE0YFl3WULneqwHq7oRy26ED/HE0 4rD6oqduOYrmvCk8g242uB4VwMcwRoZZuuJ1GV1ip/FhfKqpHRQApxnQ5Sn5YAVB1tze uj6cF5QObF9WLKiW6StcqwgEErokJFDwg2FiHhLprrKCtlC0+UJ+E6OAnO5KL5hrtert fhXieIAiMNDyRTnU7IR21rL3wc26jfxvvo2GUQJbXVYr4IElqXDJs7gB1hovvKwgVK0n K8dLp6NzgVvVk2xvRSSJqAQWpmlaa2aX+P/z6L1cnRip+l5oaFAC/A0ssJlRwsg8wK9v t7hw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=Cl9TFpScyJNouJYrYQUSFRhHkvfbn5S+VaslQhAD2Fc=; b=FdFQ/R2KGDUGffAc5uCsbytMf69p1O+4qij9h+V59ZcRAMWywQ3w9Em+Sfgu7SuzyO NwfjcGtNAGnvKCzkOnBE/S2iAm/PnBevuzRX+q14qYGb8ijgjnF4yGb+5n/wIXgbofsp GlQRpja67YD5/mtYsNujpkoq0Vi2nn6XUpwj2RDE2CQXg5jz6npcq2rMF+DGTwHa5N7S n7QgigiTdpm/FMAk+10hKZ4Op+d9I7hIVGathPoHcqD0+u97EamOzcfQSbVnuYfTJUEp zjA6TTe9fpJVbff81X13zGpO2/F3k9OCVZ/MtNpAEF+P0IEYs0ONyDiQygM/DDMya5yR SGWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g18si11571067ejb.224.2020.08.03.21.45.35; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 21:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729185AbgHDEpa (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:45:30 -0400 Received: from mail5.windriver.com ([192.103.53.11]:55664 "EHLO mail5.wrs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726000AbgHDEpa (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 00:45:30 -0400 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0744hTcB002937 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:43:50 -0700 Received: from [128.224.162.157] (128.224.162.157) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 21:43:24 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp - zero the cmd data after use it To: Herbert Xu CC: Tom Lendacky , Gary Hook , David , , References: <20200803075858.3561-1-liwei.song@windriver.com> <20200803125242.GA7689@gondor.apana.org.au> <87ae939b-4983-4e96-cc3d-1aa1d1b3d3ae@windriver.com> <20200804040420.GA10850@gondor.apana.org.au> <1b6be879-8449-b519-046f-0312e57aa9a4@windriver.com> <20200804042215.GA10939@gondor.apana.org.au> From: Liwei Song Message-ID: <7f5e38f8-c7a4-65c7-647b-749f66ccc48b@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:43:21 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200804042215.GA10939@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/4/20 12:22, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:20:21PM +0800, Liwei Song wrote: >> >> Yes, the other process should do this zero work, but the case I met is >> this address will appear in the slab_alloc_node() as freelist pointer of slub, >> and before slub do zero wrok, even kzalloc() doesn't work with this address. > > That would be memory corruption which has nothing to do with your > patch. If it is occurring then you should fix the place that is > corrupting the memory and not work around it like this. OK, understand, thanks for your suggestion. Liwei. > > Cheers, >