Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 07:53:10 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC:     <yuehaibing@huawei.com>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        <kuba@kernel.org>, <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
        <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip_vti: Fix unused variable warning
Message-ID: <20200804055310.GK20687@gauss3.secunet.de>
References: <20200731064952.36900-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
 <20200803.151349.926022361234213749.davem@davemloft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200803.151349.926022361234213749.davem@davemloft.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 03:13:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:49:52 +0800
> 
> > If CONFIG_INET_XFRM_TUNNEL is set but CONFIG_IPV6 is n,
> > 
> > net/ipv4/ip_vti.c:493:27: warning: 'vti_ipip6_handler' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> 
> Steffen, please pick this up if you haven't already.

I still have this one in my queue, it came in after
I did the the ipsec-next pull request last week.
Now the 5.8 release was inbetween, so it should go
to the ipsec tree. I'm waiting until I can backmerge
the offending patch into the ipsec tree and apply it
then.

Alternatively to speed things up, you can take it
directly into net-next before you do the pull request
to Linus. In case you prefer that:

Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>