Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: Add Support for HiSilicon ETM device
To:     liuqi115@huawei.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxarm@huawei.com
References: <1596461740-13527-1-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com>
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Message-ID: <d7271f87-719a-cc3b-6306-bb07f24fe070@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 11:47:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1596461740-13527-1-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Qi

On 08/03/2020 02:35 PM, Qi Liu wrote:
> Add ETMv4 periperhal ID for HiSilicon Hip08 and Hip09 platform. Hip08
> contains ETMv4.2 device and Hip09 contains ETMv4.5 device.

Does the ETMv4.5 on your system implement system instructions to access
the ETMs ? If so, please could you give the following series on your
board ?

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2020-July/587745.html


> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> index 0c35cd5e..4a4f0bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c
> @@ -1561,6 +1561,8 @@ static struct amba_cs_uci_id uci_id_etm4[] = {
>   };
> 
>   static const struct amba_id etm4_ids[] = {
> +	CS_AMBA_ID(0x000b6d02),			/* HiSilicon-Hip09 */
> +	CS_AMBA_ID(0x000b6d01),			/* HiSilicon-Hip08 */

Please use CS_AMBA_UCI_ID() instead.

We should stop using the CS_AMBA_ID()


Suzuki