Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964948AbWEOOex (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 10:34:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964949AbWEOOex (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 10:34:53 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:28364 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964948AbWEOOex convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 10:34:53 -0400 From: Darren Hart Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center To: =?iso-8859-15?q?S=E9bastien_Dugu=E9?= Subject: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 07:34:38 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: lkml , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , mista.tapas@gmx.net, efault@gmx.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, rlrevell@joe-job.com References: <200605121924.53917.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <1147691746.3970.16.camel@frecb000686> In-Reply-To: <1147691746.3970.16.camel@frecb000686> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605150734.39849.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1308 Lines: 35 On Monday 15 May 2006 04:15, S?bastien Dugu? wrote: > I've been running you test program on my box under a stress-kernel > load and did not observe any failure as you describe, not even a max > latency overshooting the 100 us limit (max latencies in the 60~70 us). > > I even went to decrease PERIOD to 1 ms and still no failure. > > I'm running rt20 with the futex priority based wakeup patch on > a dual 2.8 GHz HT Xeon box. All hardirq and softirq threads are at their > default priority. Interesting, I'll have to try this on some more hardware and see if I can reproduce there. > > How do you generate the network load you mention? Maybe I could try at > least with the same load you're using. I was simply copying a 60MB file to the test machine via scp, in a bash while loop. I haven't been doing this on my most recent runs however, and they still fail. So I don't believe the net load is directly related. I am going to work with Ingo's trace-it.c today and report back. -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Realtime Linux Team - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/