Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp154534pxa; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 19:47:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLe7KYOC91AkZpHIHcpbe4P40AoOq4V2nTT20kq9YEik+7VYqkJpDZhbtzkySZ1n9ZkpAi X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1cb3:: with SMTP id cz19mr774241edb.299.1596595665352; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:47:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596595665; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YNi/qkXkWqdbj3DGPTL0hKvLvv12yFSt+GDs7EdZAvFHQfKX39Q021VtYwA8j3s1Fh BWSuVFvBe3rfEcdcKos7VR/pP7rIElRtfInS+Ie29KEi8a1ZlMmJnsm4NwJTNcAhfv7h ADO9kqFRzOzx/+2SnlgvZnXP32u2gqhJgDxi734IBZcGrTtZXVdxPnfP7c8fToBR9F/c BPfHUduZjAhrpZnITT5Yf2++RtzeM3pczO1plY8hXn95JI3A57++rFJOEHFgV683ViGU sMjX4dQ9zfOaUNI+vw43RAvVmsBQS6HYuV3GjfJkwU/2C84ZMdOGxTFFN608dilEEJ1r gpHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=tXqaNqcLnhgKNDbKiAEY8RPQoNKrpVl46ZTkCz/J708=; b=GNgIwBaSn7iwqCRwUV7+3Vdf1xs9EPnKtlpmII3MwAdbIZGQboQZlz6hi/RpfuIyt2 x8uk+ogCNi1GBWQJTfoRdxvrVx4s3iOwubbcGnuI+4nKB0dWX144zZkiiLu1lD/rBGnL w8Zy9LPMtYhjDt+RwwqRp0bBcITGHzNRSYVdF/lmdkyjKjlQNvjeJRulDG7A+TzcYqFR ytEITFbWbQAvG4qxev6bcOB5iIkT+/SlJBEzfscjgQ7HZtymbOiMPNCI0CXOtG9MP569 166rKmOd3v9Xxcy5eVQ/MFu8bju3dDZak0unBxXCCm6lZhhnxBzHDxbUvz2pvrlF07Sc wvIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cXWQWWWJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jz19si438248ejb.638.2020.08.04.19.47.21; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 19:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cXWQWWWJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727051AbgHECqi (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 22:46:38 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:32077 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727004AbgHECqg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 22:46:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596595593; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tXqaNqcLnhgKNDbKiAEY8RPQoNKrpVl46ZTkCz/J708=; b=cXWQWWWJFzsx1fhqoSoMNzHKgHleQhjrhRaheTe+V0z0uBx3orzvHbfig94t/VA4Dj0svn uMcWwca2WStO00kKhBdO/AEWUCVQxe8YkeaJv5NS+asryO9lnGfaqixh+ZYb2oNIeLQVq/ BJ95JZcwq0ngjPRhOa9RpqqbOlynycs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-40-xoPcpJlAOtuhXQVhUVjKtA-1; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:46:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xoPcpJlAOtuhXQVhUVjKtA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2EB59; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 02:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-13-169.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.169]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3FAD1A923; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 02:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:46:13 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Coly Li Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Xiao Ni , Bart Van Assche , Christoph Hellwig , Enzo Matsumiya , Jens Axboe , Evan Green Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: tolerate 0 byte discard_granularity in __blkdev_issue_discard() Message-ID: <20200805024613.GB1981569@T590> References: <20200804142332.29961-1-colyli@suse.de> <20200804235811.GA1981569@T590> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:54:00AM +0800, Coly Li wrote: > On 2020/8/5 07:58, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:23:32PM +0800, Coly Li wrote: > >> When some buggy driver doesn't set its queue->limits.discard_granularity > >> (e.g. current loop device driver), discard at LBA 0 on such device will > >> trigger a kernel BUG() panic from block/blk-mq.c:563. > >> > >> [ 955.565006][ C39] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > >> [ 955.559660][ C39] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI > >> [ 955.622171][ C39] CPU: 39 PID: 248 Comm: ksoftirqd/39 Tainted: G E 5.8.0-default+ #40 > >> [ 955.622171][ C39] Hardware name: Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650 -[7X05CTO1WW]-/-[7X05CTO1WW]-, BIOS -[IVE160M-2.70]- 07/17/2020 > >> [ 955.622175][ C39] RIP: 0010:blk_mq_end_request+0x107/0x110 > >> [ 955.622177][ C39] Code: 48 8b 03 e9 59 ff ff ff 48 89 df 5b 5d 41 5c e9 9f ed ff ff 48 8b 35 98 3c f4 00 48 83 c7 10 48 83 c6 19 e8 cb 56 c9 ff eb cb <0f> 0b 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 56 41 54 > >> [ 955.622179][ C39] RSP: 0018:ffffb1288701fe28 EFLAGS: 00010202 > >> [ 955.749277][ C39] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff956fffba5080 RCX: 0000000000004003 > >> [ 955.749278][ C39] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > >> [ 955.749279][ C39] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > >> [ 955.749279][ C39] R10: ffffb1288701fd28 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffa8e05160 > >> [ 955.749280][ C39] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: ffffffffa7ad3a1e > >> [ 955.749281][ C39] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff95bfbda00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > >> [ 955.749282][ C39] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > >> [ 955.749282][ C39] CR2: 00007f6f0ef766a8 CR3: 0000005a37012002 CR4: 00000000007606e0 > >> [ 955.749283][ C39] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > >> [ 955.749284][ C39] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > >> [ 955.749284][ C39] PKRU: 55555554 > >> [ 955.749285][ C39] Call Trace: > >> [ 955.749290][ C39] blk_done_softirq+0x99/0xc0 > >> [ 957.550669][ C39] __do_softirq+0xd3/0x45f > >> [ 957.550677][ C39] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x2f/0x1e0 > >> [ 957.550679][ C39] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x74/0x1e0 > >> [ 957.550680][ C39] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x14e/0x1e0 > >> [ 957.550684][ C39] run_ksoftirqd+0x30/0x60 > >> [ 957.550687][ C39] smpboot_thread_fn+0x149/0x1e0 > >> [ 957.886225][ C39] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20 > >> [ 957.886226][ C39] kthread+0x137/0x160 > >> [ 957.886228][ C39] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 > >> [ 957.886231][ C39] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 > >> [ 959.117120][ C39] ---[ end trace 3dacdac97e2ed164 ]--- > >> > >> This is the procedure to reproduce the panic, > >> # modprobe scsi_debug delay=0 dev_size_mb=2048 max_queue=1 > >> # losetup -f /dev/nvme0n1 --direct-io=on > >> # blkdiscard /dev/loop0 -o 0 -l 0x200 > >> > >> This is how the BUG() panic triggered by __blkdev_issue_discard(), > >> - For a NVMe SSD backing loop device, the driver does not initialize > >> its queue->limits.discard_granularity and leaves it to 0. > >> - When discard on LBA 0 of the loop device, __blkdev_issue_discard() > >> is called before loop device driver code. > >> - Inside __blkdev_issue_discard(), when calculating value of > >> granularity_aligned_lba by > >> granularity_aligned_lba = round_up(sector_mapped, > >> q->limits.discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT); > >> because sector_mapped is 0 (at LBA 0 and no partition offset), and > >> q->limits.discard_granularity is 0 (by the buggy loop driver), the > >> calculated granularity_aligned_lba is 0. > >> - The inline function bio_aligned_discard_max_sectors() is defined as > >> return round_down(UINT_MAX, q->limits.discard_granularity) >> > >> SECTOR_SHIFT; > >> when q->limits.discard_granularity is 0 from loop device driver, the > >> above calculation returns value 0. > >> - Now granularity_aligned_lba and sctor_mapped are 0, req_sectors is > >> calculated by the following lines in __blkdev_issue_discard(), > >> if (granularity_aligned_lba == sector_mapped) > >> req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, > >> bio_aligned_discard_max_sectors(q)); > >> because bio_aligned_discard_max_sectors(q) returns 0, req_sects is > >> calculated as 0. > >> - Now a discard bio is mistakenly initialized as a 0 byte bio by, > >> bio->bi_iter.bi_size = req_sects << 9; > >> and sent to loop device driver. > >> - This discard request is handled by loop device driver by following > >> code path, > >> loop_handle_cmd => do_req_filebacked => lo_fallocate => > >> file->f_op->fallocate => blkdev_fallocate => blkdev_issue_zeroout => > >> __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes > >> - Inside __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(), a 0 byte length discard bio is > >> composed and sent to the backing device of the loop device. > >> - In the I/O completion code path, in my case it is, > >> blk_done_softirq => nrq->q->mq_ops->complete => nvme_pci_complete_rq > >> => nvme_complete_rq => blk_mq_end_request > >> inside blk_mq_end_request(), blk_update_request() is called and due to > >> req->bio is NULL in previous step, blk_update_request() returns false > >> then the BUG() panic in blk_mq_end_request() is triggered. > >> > >> Although the above panic can be fixed in loop device driver, the generic > >> __blkdev_issue_discard() should also be fixed to tolerate the incorrect > >> 0 value from queue->limits.discard_granularity, in case some other buggy > >> driver makes such mistake again. > >> > >> This patch checks whether q->limits.discard_granularity is 0 in > >> __blkdev_issue_discard() and bio_aligned_discard_max_sectors(). If it is > >> 0 from some buggy driver queue, prints a warning oops information and > >> set queue_logical_block_size(q) to a local variable discard_granularity. > >> This local variable is used in round_up() and round_down() calculation, > >> now req_sects won't be 0 and no empty discard request is generated. > >> > >> Fixes: 9b15d109a6b2 ("block: improve discard bio alignment in __blkdev_issue_discard()") > >> Fixes: c52abf563049 ("loop: Better discard support for block devices") > >> Reported-by: Ming Lei > >> Signed-off-by: Coly Li > >> Cc: Hannes Reinecke > >> Cc: Ming Lei > >> Cc: Xiao Ni > >> Cc: Bart Van Assche > >> Cc: Christoph Hellwig > >> Cc: Enzo Matsumiya > >> Cc: Jens Axboe > >> Cc: Evan Green > >> --- > >> block/blk-lib.c | 8 +++++++- > >> block/blk.h | 9 +++++++-- > >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c > >> index 019e09bb9c0e..3017e4cba923 100644 > >> --- a/block/blk-lib.c > >> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c > >> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, > >> struct bio *bio = *biop; > >> unsigned int op; > >> sector_t bs_mask, part_offset = 0; > >> + sector_t discard_granularity; > >> > >> if (!q) > >> return -ENXIO; > >> @@ -54,6 +55,11 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, > >> if (!nr_sects) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> > >> + discard_granularity = q->limits.discard_granularity; > >> + /* In case some buggy driver does not set limits.discard_granularity */ > >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(discard_granularity == 0)) > >> + discard_granularity = queue_logical_block_size(q); > > > > This code path is supposed to not run in case of zero q->limits.discard_granularity, > > and looks it is fine to just warn and return -EINVAL in this case, > > see Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-block: > > > > What: /sys/block//queue/discard_granularity > > Date: May 2011 > > Contact: Martin K. Petersen > > Description: > > Devices that support discard functionality may > > internally allocate space using units that are bigger > > than the logical block size. The discard_granularity > > parameter indicates the size of the internal allocation > > unit in bytes if reported by the device. Otherwise the > > discard_granularity will be set to match the device's > > physical block size. A discard_granularity of 0 means > > that the device does not support discard functionality. > > > > What we need to fix is loop driver, if it claims to support discard, > > q->limits.discard_granularity has to be one valid value. > > Yes your suggestion is much simpler, let me do it :-) That is exactly what the following patch does: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/6f642b8a-648e-8b59-067f-6c9f4cc32fa6@suse.de/T/#m82a878277ae7ed6b7a595820112fd13beaa24c99 Thanks, Ming