Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 06:59:55 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Luca Stefani <luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com>
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAS/CEC: Fix cec_init prototype
Message-ID: <20200805045955.GB9127@nazgul.tnic>
References: <20200804161847.825391-1-luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200804161847.825391-1-luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 06:18:47PM +0200, Luca Stefani wrote:
> * late_initcall expects a function to return an integer

Please write a proper sentence for a commit message.

> Signed-off-by: Luca Stefani <luca.stefani.ge1@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ras/cec.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/cec.c b/drivers/ras/cec.c
> index 569d9ad2c594..e048e0e3949a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/cec.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/cec.c
> @@ -553,20 +553,20 @@ static struct notifier_block cec_nb = {
>  	.priority	= MCE_PRIO_CEC,
>  };
>  
> -static void __init cec_init(void)
> +static int __init cec_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (ce_arr.disabled)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;

Why 0?

I'm thinking all the cases when the init doesn't succeed should return
!0...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette