Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp309163pxa; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBa1N0NlL4eBaGAjtIwjHy20/S15AbLwA8oXHjl/IBq/AzxJ+EdAh4jejwZdJLPdIHCb0O X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2b44:: with SMTP id b4mr2056952ejg.406.1596616220812; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 01:30:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596616220; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lhvU27MAiWydMb0MC5Da+vMnrpTPhEgc17ThPLpXI9qnELUGcHYhZAb63pj1CX+PyU QbD5MaY8UW2cGiwrRpR8VpWP1b+o4xC/UGAJgvLvLUDhoXACW6GmxoKaOfxXfSBmMhp9 yxp40Cv1yt629b8Ev4yfC9zNsuM6RDFCiFVxEshCESfCkPnw4gwmoZXKPtg8jezcobc5 dedwy0+PO6rtbtAxgx9TozrYH/Xxs3tM1CvG8v3Dme7JTnDqhswxlwXr6iTAUhUDKyTl Er36NGTH3Upn85cP7TSRsz4FBKw03TiX/bxMPEPq9MQagN4Xoxbjudx+8qHMczcno/SF 9XQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=FVXiprMeiPkEoGT4A5sLzrvwYbzv4vr3XgsT3WHV+Uk=; b=SPrnH94ueT2c9Xy4ydPGRQ3efhTQVOgXYeidpt22SMnCj3ump7ojGvLq+oTtqGfXcP +Ga6s5GpBwl3l92LgJfK47/q0RT0gttBxHTlXUS3NFU7hrHAB7dVF5XjYWJOHFbqIKdU xOO7ySeV42Fb0NnnXxZmYQA7132xE/+181S+7Go3qumNZq2sgMh4QpxbT4g9J4/+NOUE UbMzhuXSV7mh0Dyx+1cQpD2+MJlK7359KHGL1tEtX/BFSF/R5K6rg0e+xHW1Aznxr00J WdBffiN5XzORzhxPUJ/A99dT4BunrPtwXKLIxj5/3oPoa1kkxnl3dDOKMyxsmBl4ogkM Em6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@126.com header.s=s110527 header.b=LFbEoL6s; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=126.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b18si835020eds.208.2020.08.05.01.29.57; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 01:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@126.com header.s=s110527 header.b=LFbEoL6s; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=126.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727998AbgHEI3M (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:29:12 -0400 Received: from mail-m965.mail.126.com ([123.126.96.5]:60616 "EHLO mail-m965.mail.126.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726563AbgHEI3I (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 04:29:08 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1833 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 04:29:07 EDT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id; bh=FVXiprMeiPkEoGT4A5 sLzrvwYbzv4vr3XgsT3WHV+Uk=; b=LFbEoL6sRPWPKgmbpFaFdhoRKtp2AH8c5a v4dsbOKxZDsaPhpPr8finOuCarGWNoW+SJj3lt02HIgHgXiWxqvj/ox0rASuuHhd mG95Ch56MA/VtcKwH8sJQ7zHJ1NFxwaN0kheiDM7tJMRumPgoEjm/li2C2rV6cj2 psY5+n21U= Received: from xr-hulk-k8s-node1933.gh.sankuai.com (unknown [101.236.11.3]) by smtp10 (Coremail) with SMTP id NuRpCgD3yrZhZipfGNE9Xg--.1772S2; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 15:57:26 +0800 (CST) From: Jiang Ying To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: wanglong19@meituan.com, heguanjun@meituan.com, jack@suse.cz Subject: [PATCH v4] ext4: fix direct I/O read error Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:57:21 +0800 Message-Id: <1596614241-178185-1-git-send-email-jiangying8582@126.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 X-CM-TRANSID: NuRpCgD3yrZhZipfGNE9Xg--.1772S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxAw47WFW8tw4rCr1UZr4xZwb_yoWrCryfpr sxCa15WrZ5Xr4xCanrK3W7uFyFy3yDGFWUXr98u345Zr15Kr9YkrWIkF1UGayUJrWv9w4Y qFZ8tryfXw1UZFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jcMa8UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [101.236.11.3] X-CM-SenderInfo: xmld0wp1lqwmqvysqiyswou0bp/1tbiXAZ3AFpEBLWCIgAAsi Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch is used to fix ext4 direct I/O read error when the read size is not aligned with block size. Then, I will use a test to explain the error. (1) Make a file that is not aligned with block size: $dd if=/dev/zero of=./test.jar bs=1000 count=3 (2) I wrote a source file named "direct_io_read_file.c" as following: #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #define BUF_SIZE 1024 int main() { int fd; int ret; unsigned char *buf; ret = posix_memalign((void **)&buf, 512, BUF_SIZE); if (ret) { perror("posix_memalign failed"); exit(1); } fd = open("./test.jar", O_RDONLY | O_DIRECT, 0755); if (fd < 0){ perror("open ./test.jar failed"); exit(1); } do { ret = read(fd, buf, BUF_SIZE); printf("ret=%d\n",ret); if (ret < 0) { perror("write test.jar failed"); } } while (ret > 0); free(buf); close(fd); } (3) Compile the source file: $gcc direct_io_read_file.c -D_GNU_SOURCE (4) Run the test program: $./a.out The result is as following: ret=1024 ret=1024 ret=952 ret=-1 write test.jar failed: Invalid argument. I have tested this program on XFS filesystem, XFS does not have this problem, because XFS use iomap_dio_rw() to do direct I/O read. And the comparing between read offset and file size is done in iomap_dio_rw(), the code is as following: if (pos < size) { retval = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, pos, pos + iov_length(iov, nr_segs) - 1); if (!retval) { retval = mapping->a_ops->direct_IO(READ, iocb, iov, pos, nr_segs); } ... } ...only when "pos < size", direct I/O can be done, or 0 will be return. I have tested the fix patch on Ext4, it is up to the mustard of EINVAL in man2(read) as following: #include ssize_t read(int fd, void *buf, size_t count); EINVAL fd is attached to an object which is unsuitable for reading; or the file was opened with the O_DIRECT flag, and either the address specified in buf, the value specified in count, or the current file offset is not suitably aligned. So I think this patch can be applied to fix ext4 direct I/O error. However Ext4 introduces direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure on kernel 5.5, the patch is commit ("ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure"), then Ext4 will be the same as XFS, they all use iomap_dio_rw() to do direct I/O read. So this problem does not exist on kernel 5.5 for Ext4. From above description, we can see this problem exists on all the kernel versions between kernel 3.14 and kernel 5.4. It will cause the Applications to fail to read. For example, when the search service downloads a new full index file, the search engine is loading the previous index file and is processing the search request, it can not use buffer io that may squeeze the previous index file in use from pagecache, so the serch service must use direct I/O read. Please apply this patch on these kernel versions, or please use the method on kernel 5.5 to fix this problem. Fixes: 9fe55eea7e4b ("Fix race when checking i_size on direct i/o read") Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Co-developed-by: Wang Long Signed-off-by: Wang Long Signed-off-by: Jiang Ying Changes since V3: Add the info: this bug could break some application that use the stable kernel releases. Changes since V2: Optimize the description of the commit message and make a variation for the patch, e.g. with: Before: loff_t size; size = i_size_read(inode); After: loff_t size = i_size_read(inode); Changes since V1: Signed-off use real name and add "Fixes:" flag --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 516faa2..a66b0ac 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3821,6 +3821,11 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter) struct inode *inode = mapping->host; size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter); ssize_t ret; + loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos; + loff_t size = i_size_read(inode); + + if (offset >= size) + return 0; /* * Shared inode_lock is enough for us - it protects against concurrent -- 1.8.3.1