Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 20:18:37 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Julia Suvorova <jsuvorov@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: introduce KVM_MEM_PCI_HOLE memory
Message-ID: <20200805201702-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20200728143741.2718593-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <20200728143741.2718593-3-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <CALMp9eSWsvufDXMuTUR3Fmh91O7tHUaqpDbAoavSMc=prpcDzg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eSWsvufDXMuTUR3Fmh91O7tHUaqpDbAoavSMc=prpcDzg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 10:05:40AM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:38 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > PCIe config space can (depending on the configuration) be quite big but
> > usually is sparsely populated. Guest may scan it by accessing individual
> > device's page which, when device is missing, is supposed to have 'pci
> > hole' semantics: reads return '0xff' and writes get discarded. Compared
> > to the already existing KVM_MEM_READONLY, VMM doesn't need to allocate
> > real memory and stuff it with '0xff'.
> 
> Note that the bus error semantics described should apply to *any*
> unbacked guest physical addresses, not just addresses in the PCI hole.
> (Typically, this also applies to the standard local APIC page
> (0xfee00xxx) when the local APIC is either disabled or in x2APIC mode,
> which is an area that kvm has had trouble with in the past.)

Well ATM from KVM's POV unbacked -> exit to userspace, right?
Not sure what you are suggesting here ...

-- 
MST