Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vdpa: introduce config op to get valid iova range
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob.miller@broadcom.com,
        lingshan.zhu@intel.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com,
        shahafs@mellanox.com, hanand@xilinx.com, mhabets@solarflare.com,
        gdawar@xilinx.com, saugatm@xilinx.com, vmireyno@marvell.com,
        zhangweining@ruijie.com.cn, eli@mellanox.com
References: <20200617032947.6371-1-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20200617032947.6371-2-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20200805085035-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <777d6e78-4271-10e9-4546-329f53962429@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 11:25:11 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200805085035-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2020/8/5 下午8:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:29:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> This patch introduce a config op to get valid iova range from the vDPA
>> device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/vdpa.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
>> index 239db794357c..b7633ed2500c 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
>> @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ struct vdpa_device {
>>   	unsigned int index;
>>   };
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * vDPA IOVA range - the IOVA range support by the device
>> + * @start: start of the IOVA range
>> + * @end: end of the IOVA range
>> + */
>> +struct vdpa_iova_range {
>> +	u64 start;
>> +	u64 end;
>> +};
>> +
> This is ambiguous. Is end in the range or just behind it?


In the range.


> How about first/last?


Sure.

Thanks


>
>
>