Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
To:     timur@kernel.org, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com,
        festevam@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Get "extal" clock rate by clk_get_rate
Date:   Thu,  6 Aug 2020 15:39:45 +0800
Message-Id: <1596699585-27429-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On some platform(.e.g. i.MX8QM MEK), the "extal" clock is different
with the mclk of codec, then the clock rate is also different.
So it is better to get clock rate of "extal" rate by clk_get_rate,
don't reuse the clock rate of mclk.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
---
 sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
index 52adedc03245..2c92a5efad61 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
@@ -696,6 +696,13 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto asrc_fail;
 		}
 	} else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "esai")) {
+		struct clk *esai_clk = clk_get(&cpu_pdev->dev, "extal");
+
+		if (!IS_ERR(esai_clk)) {
+			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[TX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
+			priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_freq[RX] = clk_get_rate(esai_clk);
+			clk_put(esai_clk);
+		}
 		priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_id[1] = ESAI_HCKT_EXTAL;
 		priv->cpu_priv.sysclk_id[0] = ESAI_HCKR_EXTAL;
 	} else if (of_node_name_eq(cpu_np, "sai")) {
-- 
2.27.0