Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964999AbWEOTrI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 15:47:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965005AbWEOTrI (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 15:47:08 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:42961 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964999AbWEOTrG (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 May 2006 15:47:06 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 NUMA panic compile error Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:47:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Ingo Molnar , haveblue@us.ibm.com, apw@shadowen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060515005637.00b54560.akpm@osdl.org> <20060515192614.GA24887@elte.hu> <20060515123929.76b9b693.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060515123929.76b9b693.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605152147.02232.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1489 Lines: 37 [... feels the love ...] On Monday 15 May 2006 21:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Nevertheless for hard-to-debug bugs i prefer if they can be reproduced > > and debugged on 32-bit too, because x86_64 debugging is still quite a > > PITA and wastes alot of time: for example it has no support for exact > > kernel stacktraces. Also, the printout of the backtrace is butt-ugly and > > as un-ergonomic to the human eye as it gets > > Yes, I find x86_64 traces significantly harder to follow. And I miss the > display of the length of the functions (do_md_run+1208 instead of > do_md_run+1208/2043). The latter form makes it easier to work out > whereabouts in the function things happened. > > That, plus the mix of hex and decimal numbers.. > > > who came up with that > > "two-maybe-one function entries per-line" nonsense? [Whoever did it he > > never had to look at (and make sense of) hundreds of stacktraces in a > > row.] > > Plus they're wide enough to get usefully wordwrapped when someone mails > them to you. Hmm, I didn't realize they were _that_ unpopular. If you got the i386 like space wasting backtraces would you guys all switch your development machines to x86-64 ? @) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/