Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Thu, 06 Aug 2020 09:55:47 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        james.morse@arm.com, drjones@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        christoffer.dall@linaro.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "KVM: arm64: Make vcpu_cp1x() work on Big Endian hosts" has
 been added to the 4.4-stable tree
In-Reply-To: <6084bc97-11ea-4b7d-086e-fb98880fca6c@huawei.com>
References: <159230500664142@kroah.com>
 <6084bc97-11ea-4b7d-086e-fb98880fca6c@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.5
Message-ID: <dec976884660057c6705be64e1e1cd20@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Kun,

On 2020-08-06 03:26, yangerkun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Not familiar with kvm. And I have a question about this patch. Maybe
> backport this patch 3204be4109ad("KVM: arm64: Make vcpu_cp1x() work on
> Big Endian hosts") without 52f6c4f02164 ("KVM: arm64: Change 32-bit
> handling of VM system registers") seems not right?

This seems sensible. Please post a backport of this patch, assuming
you are in a position to actually test it (I'm not able to run BE
kernels, let alone userspace).

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...