Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-Id: <fbe58d27cf128d5fe581e4510ded8701858f268e.1596716328.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/hwirq: Remove stale forward irq_chip declaration
To:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Date:   Thu,  6 Aug 2020 12:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Since commit identified below, the forward declaration of
struct irq_chip is useless (was struct hw_interrupt_type at that time)

Remove it, together with the associated comment.

Fixes: c0ad90a32fb6 ("[PATCH] genirq: add ->retrigger() irq op to consolidate hw_irq_resend()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 3a0db7b0b46e..538698facb80 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -372,12 +372,6 @@ static inline void may_hard_irq_enable(void) { }
 
 #define ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS	IRQ_NOREQUEST
 
-/*
- * interrupt-retrigger: should we handle this via lost interrupts and IPIs
- * or should we not care like we do now ? --BenH.
- */
-struct irq_chip;
-
 #endif  /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
 #endif	/* _ASM_POWERPC_HW_IRQ_H */
-- 
2.25.0