Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 6 Aug 2020 23:20:19 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v5.9
Message-ID: <20200806212019.GA2149204@gmail.com>
References: <20200803190354.GA1293087@gmail.com>
 <20200805110348.GA108872@zx2c4.com>
 <CAHk-=wiq+7sW3Lk5iQ0-zY5XWES4rSxK505vXsgFY=za88+RZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200806131034.GA2067370@gmail.com>
 <20200806185723.GA24304@suse.de>
 <CAHk-=wg7PHCUMD1xY=YCCeVHspAhw0YNEhyO3CnHfRPwsf6P8A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wg7PHCUMD1xY=YCCeVHspAhw0YNEhyO3CnHfRPwsf6P8A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:57 AM Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > So apparently the "the page-table pages are all pre-allocated now" is
> > > > simply not true. Joerg?
> >
> > It pre-allocates the whole vmalloc/ioremap PUD/P4D pages, but I actually
> > only tested it with 4-level paging, as I don't have access to 5-level
> > paging hardware.
> 
> I don't think Jason has either.
> 
> The
> 
>         PGD 0 P4D 0
> 
> line tells us that "pgd_present()" is true, even though PGD is 0
> (otherwise it wouldn't print the P4D part). That means that he doesn't
> have l5 enabled.
> 
> But you may obviously have different settings for CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL,
> and maybe that ends up changing something?
> 
> But since apparently it's not immediately obvious what the problem is,
> I'll revert it for now.

I've reverted it in x86/urgent as well earlier today, can send you 
that tree right now if you prefer that route.

Thanks,

	Ingo