Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:59:46 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, clew@codeaurora.org,
        mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
        Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@codeaurora.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        "open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR MESSAGING (RPMSG) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4] rpmsg: Guard against null endpoint ops in destroy
Message-ID: <20200807075946.GA3049898@kroah.com>
References: <1593017121-7953-1-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org>
 <1593017121-7953-3-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1593017121-7953-3-git-send-email-deesin@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:15:19PM +0530, Deepak Kumar Singh wrote:
> From: Chris Lew <clew@codeaurora.org>
> 
> In RPMSG GLINK the chrdev device will allocate an ept as part of the
> rpdev creation. This device will not register endpoint ops even though
> it has an allocated ept. Protect against the case where the device is
> being destroyed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Lew <clew@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Kumar Singh <deesin@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@codeaurora.org>

Should this be marked for stable kernels?

And if so, what commit does this fix?  Any reason the Fixes: tag was not
used here?

And what happened to this series?  I don't see it in linux-next, did the
maintainer ignore it?

thanks,

greg k-h