Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: doc: remove references to warning message when
 using bpf_trace_printk()
To:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>, ast@kernel.org
Cc:     kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andriin@fb.com,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@chromium.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1596801029-32395-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Message-ID: <007a231f-6352-9784-bce1-417d6572b423@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 7 Aug 2020 19:01:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1596801029-32395-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/7/20 1:50 PM, Alan Maguire wrote:
> The BPF helper bpf_trace_printk() no longer uses trace_printk();
> it is now triggers a dedicated trace event.  Hence the described
> warning is no longer present, so remove the discussion of it as
> it may confuse people.
> 
> Fixes: ac5a72ea5c89 ("bpf: Use dedicated bpf_trace_printk event instead of trace_printk()")
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>

Applied, thanks!