Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2419924pxa; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:39:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw817dpIdcyRp1Mj4EF1Qn5EkXPkIVuMsn0GkDeG6prvKVM1s146vSMfdGer+rG0Ehzhfx8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4356:: with SMTP id z22mr10832974ejm.414.1596821952932; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596821952; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ir0o9gBRAKnMd8OZ0zo8e2zdzqSGt0MQt+SSo4IOMnYtOdF+OMIgDERhuMMj2khoir 12Y5SMAql6e+9xBF+OZ9/JwxR+pylObdDqg4RVfcuVozuh1WlMoVFnqbLPr/6cwOdLkJ SDiNNGcrWEBQ9LKTyDWpAco3ZPxnd+r5CHtLUAdWx0GsymUxOCi+SfsGTH/1gr6mLgyD 3lgzrOqzW6tI3VLilX/9tCZ7cBohJ1fMYgzXJfQdJTi0a5TV9o4cr6AsOYz1o89jCWip jPTpDMpgC4ULeInnS1kEh5AcXyIfhqsHQH3xNRYwmqRpy9DF5uiEmR1oY8IFrx3hIec1 2lqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=C/YZdQC0Ww0BuTHSLWbA5PvW86cdDm7U0d2NW1ollxU=; b=XNZdDiKGIchFqnii1ksK/SX19MHbOMq9HhbqhX5aOAj8OxVLtts0YEuZjrCiCqcnMx YPrx2zsjWZmpoMEU4zLdYvP/iCdl0CF4JAdvkZqTxV+ZEnG2K8p8mh0n6kxdhvrNbboh bFsgmKjpoIIKfG53mYdm2kIhrBnWJfczMQcbnyXHYANpxSqfEQNFAfgAprcrY06JwXR0 P8in+mtRZYdp+wpq3fs+x3B0/MJcEr74ZIWwVNNcaw3uyNtehYLUu09JsarzrytIUDuw nLb8nwYvLPh0fIMGSNNv2YUg32tsLuOeCf1ava/JOOcTz18QeOe8TB2z1XW47u+/FpyK PXeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=CdPSlD8l; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o2si5816924edj.268.2020.08.07.10.38.49; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=CdPSlD8l; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726624AbgHGRiQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:38:16 -0400 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:32768 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725900AbgHGRiP (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:38:15 -0400 Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1046) id 73BD520B4908; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:38:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 73BD520B4908 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1596821895; bh=C/YZdQC0Ww0BuTHSLWbA5PvW86cdDm7U0d2NW1ollxU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CdPSlD8lhAYSTqoYgZnjbWjvmDfDKnlX2apmVVil9NWagpKMNeEu/cUpl3RZQwVXk MhUbuOc/DdxASXpR4LfjY52RnBEvfglDsi5Zi0k/sTfFeqglZiWucXcZLSye+0f+4N nQlGWJBwLY2Z8dm8aXBTrq9pM2c9P/XnqAgnyCRA= From: Dhananjay Phadke To: ray.jui@broadcom.com Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, dphadke@linux.microsoft.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com, rjui@broadcom.com, wsa@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: iproc: fix race between client unreg and isr Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:38:15 -0700 Message-Id: <1596821895-105875-1-git-send-email-dphadke@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <574e1d63-cfe0-8e0b-1b45-f91ee9b3cb84@broadcom.com> References: <574e1d63-cfe0-8e0b-1b45-f91ee9b3cb84@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ray Jui wrote: > > Any progress yet? > > I don't know if Dhananjay is actively working on this or not. > > Rayagonda, given that you have the I2C slave setup already, do you think > you can help to to test and above sequence from Wolfram (by using the > widened delay window as instructed)? > > Thanks, > > Ray Sorry I was out for a while, I've tested the fix with delay and original i2c client test, will send v2 patch shortly. Thanks, Dhananjay