Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2431345pxa; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymCbc3PkNJUOB4XZ7pGfdv4dfihtquM3EvVaxM9aCaqYlZ/SJq0pGsXS0BZZe3N8TAiitZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c7d2:: with SMTP id dc18mr10868794ejb.135.1596823074808; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596823074; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uxhjAjZr0pSQxCKj7xdC52RnPm9eqzz5jokZbF3sTgqDWL9ZH4gNiLtUQCXLhkEasu n5gtuRGMG6dXLGvRqwCaceDOviBE/3iVdeXUD1pBGIiTa4cWvKb/sMVdxxbnsUoCw/FN P7yA3vrrHAWwEY0BPH5LzM5yajhwioQfWxS67cu246zYPxCdNO6ubEqnG0X8Kqir6pQg pJvi3WJH6edAYVR7h1gozXufsLmb05nXrYgfi+kxMIcviI6TVd8Ji/DnQNMTQvFPMKmW tbZ1+B3VawssKYCDZa3AAESwki5Y/4vDoMEKCDY6eKfqSQLbmnwwBGEDGG+bxqhd45oV Vr/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Y5oXFMw+ipS3NkqrrnKB1VbNotWPhvVuWWOOkcuHhNQ=; b=mNRMncD4bKZaN+4N1Cy3vy8rqNO0Hx+JDsp3+/tFuP4WDAK4MWI2X+qTY23q3uQWSK zekfhAcal7r9SMRFHceIWb4Njctk2AU3YmAEb31WlUds5V41FiIXH9RoBB8a0nT/LGI6 INE15r8XTkF5iHMzEr9Niy+XgM8CKMxvriYeynJFYt3YUZKqe+IRFn7XqduY+jG4Fpjz iN5W8B5opZrksunxEoYTEcDla6XUNtGn9hAedM31A183AaARIoUHz33otn6uMTuaph91 MZSYfd6eQLqTz3Ojk7zqUHwUkDXOwH2X2uuXY5w9AMsQ8wje35CqysM48Czn51ZMjpb0 ZmVg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@posk.io header.s=google header.b=TpoohK+t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z20si5812716ejm.732.2020.08.07.10.57.31; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@posk.io header.s=google header.b=TpoohK+t; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726971AbgHGR4L (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:56:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49000 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725934AbgHGR4J (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:56:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x542.google.com (mail-ed1-x542.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::542]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D800C061756 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x542.google.com with SMTP id a14so1865835edx.7 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:56:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posk.io; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y5oXFMw+ipS3NkqrrnKB1VbNotWPhvVuWWOOkcuHhNQ=; b=TpoohK+tF4wMzEF31mfX3oXnglXMAEjG/Sa0g9HCs54/gAI19UrsQ4DLnBj20Vr8ZG uFbOW5M3Pf4Wg0wmM45ojXJ3WNS8Yt9WJCG9c4sVZpb00X09QCFqxa+GuuOQC+Gw52u5 tWNESJ1+tujIMG5vgPBIdXhNg+z2nRvNQ0odT4e1H/CGmVo4GXZuPMpKs6b8v5ZWoW5Z HkjVf4GcyVT6EVpOHe6vcMuXpMWAiwwa49gWXqUU3SG0hGxKgK8C8bmH2rAg6LxXXJxX l5vIPHoNqs3mHaWE1m/zkR10DNfF8CWmJQdm7UdqbkGdw+aShQkxjQudgwrUyTwdv71U Nwsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y5oXFMw+ipS3NkqrrnKB1VbNotWPhvVuWWOOkcuHhNQ=; b=Cyp/174XEM+udDPYJa0UqnXdGWIAw5016UVLkELGcC3CIfSidASyZt2R+7b3jplT/1 zgRVlOaO7x7CJRxROSNzj+GCP0I7xCE/MwxZhenIB0gWqHMv8fzAo/1/vL7K2sxf9Sqk Bc1smOSeNaMcq4a5cXkaHUe/NeOBYT5LYy9u0EgPU9by7ZacnzHiBLwZfEUAUIsxJ3VL Dg0tB6sW2Y4Gr36gs/OrOBO459rWS0xaE1H6E5atO6hydogfbbnm9it/B558rqnWzS5x y73nKenJxaxdaPvsum2F6eLnym1L+7Pqr2ThFtuj2izYqhw3IA5SYXXMMO1H6tIna4E8 Y7iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RJi5f6VnatAbpUmPMPr+nUKjLBUysur+qthpA6/P+K/R4njBa vHSV/F4SfHZgGHXwQGi41/+M7YKWCWhSJ1KWEfuAPA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:da44:: with SMTP id a4mr2837738edk.36.1596822967842; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 10:56:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200806170544.382140-1-posk@google.com> <20200806170544.382140-2-posk@google.com> <20200807002705.GA889@tardis> In-Reply-To: <20200807002705.GA889@tardis> From: Peter Oskolkov Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:55:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] rseq/selftests: test MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU To: Boqun Feng Cc: Peter Oskolkov , Mathieu Desnoyers , "Paul E . McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul Turner , Chris Kennelly Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:27 PM Boqun Feng wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 10:05:44AM -0700, Peter Oskolkov wrote: > > Based on Google-internal RSEQ work done by > > Paul Turner and Andrew Hunter. > > > > This patch adds a selftest for MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU. > > The test quite often fails without the previous patch in this patchset, > > but consistently passes with it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov > > --- > > .../selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 181 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c > > index eb3f6db36d36..147c80deac19 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/basic_percpu_ops_test.c > > @@ -3,16 +3,21 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > +#include > > > > #include "rseq.h" > > > > #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0])) > > > > +#define MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU (1<<7) > > + > > struct percpu_lock_entry { > > intptr_t v; > > } __attribute__((aligned(128))); > > @@ -289,6 +294,180 @@ void test_percpu_list(void) > > assert(sum == expected_sum); > > } > > > > +struct test_membarrier_thread_args { > > + int stop; > > + intptr_t percpu_list_ptr; > > +}; > > + > > +/* Worker threads modify data in their "active" percpu lists. */ > > +void *test_membarrier_worker_thread(void *arg) > > +{ > > + struct test_membarrier_thread_args *args = > > + (struct test_membarrier_thread_args *)arg; > > + const int iters = 10 * 1000 * 1000; > > + int i; > > + > > + if (rseq_register_current_thread()) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_register_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n", > > + errno, strerror(errno)); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < iters; ++i) { > > + while (true) { > > + int cpu, ret; > > + struct percpu_list *list_ptr = (struct percpu_list *) > > + atomic_load(&args->percpu_list_ptr); > > + > > What if the manager thread update ->percpu_list_ptr and call > membarrier() here? I.e. > > CPU0 CPU1 > list_ptr = atomic_load(&args->percpu_list_ptr); // read list_b > > atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, list_a); > sys_membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU, 1); // send ipi to restart rseq.cs on CPU1 > > > cpu = rseq_cpu_start(); // start a rseq.cs and accessing list_b! > > The thing is, atomic_load() is an reference to ->percpu_list_ptr, which > is outside the rseq.cs, simply restarting rseq doesn't kill this > reference. > > Am I missing something subtle? rseq_cmpeqv_cmpeqv_store is used below to make sure the reference is the one that should be used; if it is no longer "active", the iteration is restarted. > > Regards, > Boqun > > > + if (!list_ptr) > > + continue; /* Not yet initialized. */ > > + > > + cpu = rseq_cpu_start(); > > + struct percpu_list_node *node = list_ptr->c[cpu].head; > > + const intptr_t prev = node->data; > > + > > + ret = rseq_cmpeqv_cmpeqv_storev(&node->data, prev, > > + &args->percpu_list_ptr, > > + (intptr_t)list_ptr, prev + 1, cpu); > > + if (!ret) > > + break; /* Success. */ > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (rseq_unregister_current_thread()) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_unregister_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n", > > + errno, strerror(errno)); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > +void test_membarrier_init_percpu_list(struct percpu_list *list) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + memset(list, 0, sizeof(*list)); > > + for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) { > > + struct percpu_list_node *node; > > + > > + node = malloc(sizeof(*node)); > > + assert(node); > > + node->data = 0; > > + node->next = NULL; > > + list->c[i].head = node; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +void test_membarrier_free_percpu_list(struct percpu_list *list) > > +{ > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) > > + free(list->c[i].head); > > +} > > + > > +static int sys_membarrier(int cmd, int flags) > > +{ > > + return syscall(__NR_membarrier, cmd, flags); > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * The manager thread swaps per-cpu lists that worker threads see, > > + * and validates that there are no unexpected modifications. > > + */ > > +void *test_membarrier_manager_thread(void *arg) > > +{ > > + struct test_membarrier_thread_args *args = > > + (struct test_membarrier_thread_args *)arg; > > + struct percpu_list list_a, list_b; > > + intptr_t expect_a = 0, expect_b = 0; > > + int cpu_a = 0, cpu_b = 0; > > + > > + if (rseq_register_current_thread()) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_register_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n", > > + errno, strerror(errno)); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + > > + /* Init lists. */ > > + test_membarrier_init_percpu_list(&list_a); > > + test_membarrier_init_percpu_list(&list_b); > > + > > + atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, (intptr_t)&list_a); > > + > > + while (!atomic_load(&args->stop)) { > > + /* list_a is "active". */ > > + cpu_a = rand() % CPU_SETSIZE; > > + /* > > + * As list_b is "inactive", we should never see changes > > + * to list_b. > > + */ > > + if (expect_b != atomic_load(&list_b.c[cpu_b].head->data)) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Membarrier test failed\n"); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + > > + /* Make list_b "active". */ > > + atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, (intptr_t)&list_b); > > + sys_membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU, cpu_a); > > + /* > > + * Cpu A should now only modify list_b, so we values > > + * in list_a should be stable. > > + */ > > + expect_a = atomic_load(&list_a.c[cpu_a].head->data); > > + > > + cpu_b = rand() % CPU_SETSIZE; > > + /* > > + * As list_a is "inactive", we should never see changes > > + * to list_a. > > + */ > > + if (expect_a != atomic_load(&list_a.c[cpu_a].head->data)) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Membarrier test failed\n"); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + > > + /* Make list_a "active". */ > > + atomic_store(&args->percpu_list_ptr, (intptr_t)&list_a); > > + sys_membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU, cpu_b); > > + /* Remember a value from list_b. */ > > + expect_b = atomic_load(&list_b.c[cpu_b].head->data); > > + } > > + > > + test_membarrier_free_percpu_list(&list_a); > > + test_membarrier_free_percpu_list(&list_b); > > + > > + if (rseq_unregister_current_thread()) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_unregister_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n", > > + errno, strerror(errno)); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > +/* Test MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_RESTART_RSEQ_ON_CPU membarrier command. */ > > +void test_membarrier(void) > > +{ > > + struct test_membarrier_thread_args thread_args; > > + pthread_t worker_threads[CPU_SETSIZE]; > > + pthread_t manager_thread; > > + int i; > > + > > + thread_args.stop = 0; > > + thread_args.percpu_list_ptr = 0; > > + pthread_create(&manager_thread, NULL, > > + test_membarrier_manager_thread, &thread_args); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) > > + pthread_create(&worker_threads[i], NULL, > > + test_membarrier_worker_thread, &thread_args); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < CPU_SETSIZE; i++) > > + pthread_join(worker_threads[i], NULL); > > + > > + atomic_store(&thread_args.stop, 1); > > + pthread_join(manager_thread, NULL); > > +} > > + > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > > { > > if (rseq_register_current_thread()) { > > @@ -300,6 +479,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > test_percpu_spinlock(); > > printf("percpu_list\n"); > > test_percpu_list(); > > + printf("membarrier\n"); > > + test_membarrier(); > > if (rseq_unregister_current_thread()) { > > fprintf(stderr, "Error: rseq_unregister_current_thread(...) failed(%d): %s\n", > > errno, strerror(errno)); > > -- > > 2.28.0.163.g6104cc2f0b6-goog > >