Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp3365049pxa; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 20:16:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyezEyabV7RBLWXo0RzNb7LJOVgRxtRLJN907STiS3LeBP75+Ev1pEvDyJeCGvUPlJKs6+d X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7790:: with SMTP id s16mr17073491ejm.254.1596942977875; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 20:16:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1596942977; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DpuCF33y9c/AKi6caoGGJI0a7VpYLrvlfdmf0Da89GWfjYCjdZ2Au1oJSxVuMg+vpR NOHMXEozDd/yN6eS2IixZHQhfsZZHDXa47uQ8UbXUmlE/2kLCiX76ZcLMu45VujEkMxD cMJr75iI2KJadVqA5KSUVK6sICBrHVobjLqQ52gVEs94xc96FEbbuY7tSxSb0WqST484 GXlBP+H75rNLRs1yhrT0y3tsVZM4Eb/lnBqCBQzQaHMcDbJ7grx0b/MYXN97WQU0TM8v 1+pXTONtSzshdyQDgtbvp04W1vwKC3JYEOG1DD9PlfZu/mGzAJkM86EB62pAPAyPU5o0 87Iw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:content-transfer-encoding:dkim-signature:mime-version; bh=2ivtOfAOler4FAH55M0n5ddG1VBUHe/kuySC+pAfY/g=; b=Qva7Dflw0Pda49YNQ/zMnrQqIbhdbkcnEgabcSCi9KcDOrfbgYCpCWdk9pUTxCI6KN envXfaEBVfRGKdnhwl5Xmhq7iMchC/xUdNqySis968cSje2ZJAx+x0eorPxjHaiMz1kr PKNU4/NoeWhX4lbiIwHIJ/NONjEUhRWASPsnE779cN/x6+QMWvnHKy9WW9InZBrduOzo wywModN+PQZxEvJnaipsAvnVwRZvcyQvdtMaancrYqX4CtWGkJfcK6xvzvBJmZt538NY zdoeQfMhxzJX7z7mvvoxHRU/AsJbILDMXfb4CXcuewF2mFnlT35tZTxcCRXwbU/0Wml4 jRvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=RzVfooby; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g21si8062579edr.544.2020.08.08.20.15.40; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 20:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@firemail.cc header.s=mail header.b=RzVfooby; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726120AbgHIDKI (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 8 Aug 2020 23:10:08 -0400 Received: from mail.cock.li ([37.120.193.124]:56550 "EHLO mail.cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725988AbgHIDKI (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Aug 2020 23:10:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=firemail.cc; s=mail; t=1596942603; bh=GjTGfoW9F+VaziRLEHlDkhHQnJaM8xdQcIqswe3AOsc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=RzVfoobygpsiz2644bqiA5GQbK77LhvITYczTd9+/dvw7GGfQ+Kp3ft8oXOayuWfV ZgNIt7bmro8b3juLuuecdzD9WHiiDNV0NaJ/J2uKlqZs01nZ4q+56/LwjD1cyauiIg 1CbRGDDT+p3kXDkCGKRGtMmX3Jd7JoWatIyqi8yXNLwUeW+hMZ/cDbQki0zk/P9wwn qrH4gyv9nQmFRYhUcGkKNfpVAnmLgwzv/2lLXca0O9xTK7veBqGbCcAFiPLwkxnRQ9 BBedOlVvB1bLj0sLnDOkMtz6E/1K1O8lmQtAiFRZ5JF6XOST5vHfnpNUPMOsiGqOjD aZ7kxl99zr5ig== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 03:10:02 +0000 From: nipponmail@firemail.cc To: bruce@perens.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, esr@thyrsus.com, moglen@columbia.edu, blukashev@sempervictus.com, tcallawa@redhat.com, editor@lwn.net, skraw.ml@ithnet.com, torvalds@osdl.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Bradly Spengler interview (GRSecurity) (Blatant GPL violators vs GCC and Linux Kernel) Message-ID: X-Sender: nipponmail@firemail.cc User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thought you might be interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv3a2tzUTn4 GRSecurity violates both the Linux kernel's copyright and the GCC copyright by forbidding redistribution of the patches (in their Access Agreement): which are non-seperable derivative works of the kernel and (in the case of the GCC plugins) GCC. Yes: threatening consequences if a licensee redistributes is a restraint on the "rights" given by the original copyright owners. Those "plugins" he is talking about as-well as the kernel patch violate the GPLv2. The GPLv2 _FORBIDS_ adding additional clauses not-within the GPL between the derivative-licensee and the down-the-line licensee. Bradly Spengler / OpenSourceSecurity are violating this stipulation, blatantly, in writing. They are also violating the "no additional restrictions" stipulation in the GPLv2. They ARE violating the Linux and the GCC copyright.