Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:03:55 +0800
From:   Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To:     chenzhou <chenzhou10@huawei.com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com,
        corbet@lwn.net, John.P.donnelly@oracle.com,
        prabhakar.pkin@gmail.com, bhsharma@redhat.com, horms@verge.net.au,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        guohanjun@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com, huawei.libin@huawei.com,
        wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel
Message-ID: <20200810060355.GB6988@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
References: <20200801130856.86625-1-chenzhou10@huawei.com>
 <20200801130856.86625-6-chenzhou10@huawei.com>
 <20200808100239.GB60590@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <96d0da23-d484-7f66-1680-07b4b5984831@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <96d0da23-d484-7f66-1680-07b4b5984831@huawei.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

> > Previously I remember we talked about to use similar logic as X86, but I
> > remember you mentioned on some arm64 platform there could be no low
> > memory at all.  Is this not a problem now for the fallback?  Just be
> > curious, thanks for the update, for the common part looks good.
> Hi Dave,
> 
> Did you mean this discuss: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/122?

I meant about this reply instead :)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/16/616

Thanks
Dave