Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:20 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To:     christian.koenig@amd.com
Cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf.rst: repair length of title underline
Message-ID: <20200810130620.GS2352366@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mail-Followup-To: christian.koenig@amd.com,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200809061739.16803-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
 <7d434810-79bd-89a3-18f8-c5c2a2524822@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7d434810-79bd-89a3-18f8-c5c2a2524822@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 09.08.20 um 08:17 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn:
> > With commit 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are
> > a bad idea"), document generation warns:
> > 
> >    Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst:182: \
> >    WARNING: Title underline too short.
> > 
> > Repair length of title underline to remove warning.
> > 
> > Fixes: 72b6ede73623 ("dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea")
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> 
> Should I pick it up into drm-misc-next?

Yes please. For the future if you need to check if someone has commit
rights and can push themselves:

https://people.freedesktop.org/~seanpaul/whomisc.html

Yeah with gitlab this would all be a bit more reasonable, but we get by
meanwhile :-)

Cheers, Daniel
> 
> > ---
> > Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent fix to your new documentation.
> > 
> >   Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > index 100bfd227265..13ea0cc0a3fa 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst
> > @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ DMA Fence uABI/Sync File
> >      :internal:
> >   Indefinite DMA Fences
> > -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   At various times &dma_fence with an indefinite time until dma_fence_wait()
> >   finishes have been proposed. Examples include:
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch