Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200806113236.GZ2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200806131702.GA3029162@elver.google.com> <CANpmjNNqt8YrCad4WqgCoXvH47pRXtSLpnTKhD8W8+UpoYJ+jQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANpmjNO860SHpNve+vaoAOgarU1SWy8o--tUWCqNhn82OLCiew@mail.gmail.com>
 <fe2bfa7f-132f-7581-a967-d01d58be1588@suse.com> <20200807095032.GA3528289@elver.google.com>
 <16671cf3-3885-eb06-79ff-4cbfaeeaea79@suse.com> <20200807113838.GA3547125@elver.google.com>
 <e5bf3e6a-efff-7170-5ee6-1798008393a2@suse.com> <CANpmjNPau_DEYadey9OL+iFZKEaUTqnFnyFs1dU12o00mg7ofA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200807151903.GA1263469@elver.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200807151903.GA1263469@elver.google.com>
From:   Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:00:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CANpmjNM1jASqCFYZpteVrZCa2V2D_DbXaqvoCV_Ac2boYfDXnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch_local*() helpers
To:     =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= <jgross@suse.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        fenghua.yu@intel.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>, yu-cheng.yu@intel.com,
        sdeep@vmware.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+8db9e1ecde74e590a657@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 17:19, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 02:08PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 14:04, J=C3=BCrgen Gro=C3=9F <jgross@suse.com> wr=
ote:
> > >
> > > On 07.08.20 13:38, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 12:35PM +0200, J=C3=BCrgen Gro=C3=9F wrote:
...
> > > >> I think CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL shouldn't matter, but I'm not complete=
ly
> > > >> sure about that. CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS would be my primary sus=
pect.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, PARAVIRT_XXL doesn't make a different. When disabling
> > > > PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS, however, the warnings go away.
> > >
> > > Thanks for testing!
> > >
> > > I take it you are doing the tests in a KVM guest?
> >
> > Yes, correct.
> >
> > > If so I have a gut feeling that the use of local_irq_save() and
> > > local_irq_restore() in kvm_wait() might be fishy. I might be complete=
ly
> > > wrong here, though.
> >
> > Happy to help debug more, although I might need patches or pointers
> > what to play with.
> >
> > > BTW, I think Xen's variant of pv spinlocks is fine (no playing with I=
RQ
> > > on/off).
> > >
> > > Hyper-V seems to do the same as KVM, and kicking another vcpu could b=
e
> > > problematic as well, as it is just using IPI.
>
> I experimented a bit more, and the below patch seems to solve the
> warnings. However, that was based on your pointer about kvm_wait(), and
> I can't quite tell if it is the right solution.
>
> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place
> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter,
>
>         raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */
>         ...
>         kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused */
>         ...
>         raw_local_irq_restore();
>
> and therefore, using raw variants in kvm_wait() works. It's also safe
> because it doesn't call any other libraries that would result in corrupt
> IRQ state AFAIK.

Just to follow-up, it'd still be nice to fix this. Suggestions?

I could send the below as a patch, but can only go off my above
hypothesis and the fact that syzbot is happier, so not entirely
convincing.

Thanks,
-- Marco

> ------ >8 ------
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index 233c77d056c9..1d412d1466f0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
>         if (in_nmi())
>                 return;
>
> -       local_irq_save(flags);
> +       raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>
>         if (READ_ONCE(*ptr) !=3D val)
>                 goto out;
> @@ -810,10 +810,10 @@ static void kvm_wait(u8 *ptr, u8 val)
>         if (arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
>                 halt();
>         else
> -               safe_halt();
> +               raw_safe_halt();
>
>  out:
> -       local_irq_restore(flags);
> +       raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32