Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp280374pxa; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:51:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzELqTI0DlkXzvb8ra4dHfeif0TqqAlu2dbZ3TuNm1TanXQOSHuWn9sK55UE8QgSak7g9vo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cb0a:: with SMTP id lk10mr9364783ejb.209.1597139484496; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:51:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597139484; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dBKuCUZzozURA1koSLzCVuwxvPADM/4muvjLYVlvCWdseaqD3Dskrdrw/IKJ5cW2PS Df2cMujbEkqGFilLlrNZDoQ6oG5vWzYy7vBxF1t4Ze03KGaDtrrB8B3Gwp4Ws2nla31G P5aTNGIxqO+DO/ZdYgxv3gCS6mYQftP3cPLEtHYSFh8PVSAMXjbRg9gqx785G6r5e1Bt XGxNhbslbQIeK8PvXhdMIPlQO0/u7et2OksffyeS2L4Dj9ZOr7xsa1oL8UljTsPjuMKZ uxCiQGAGdPcACBzASxXPsfSwI/RhJJCzYz/575wiVsY4Jd4JMWPGCs3907dN7j+Q2bh9 Y8KA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=rkrZ6L4m+G1fef9D8l/vVLYyuHUNqodndALlYz8mPPo=; b=KVLpOQ9sZmP4cYrzKGORNUt6hZhUVRrXA+uLNMp5LQl6dH+qbhu1iznJlbLpyDyrFz Mn1pMM4xEfo2X7PcnsMae1boMKwbgaBWO9bRfa+SOpJ43qAwkW8X/w0NXHbk7jFYGJ+W v/vf2S6RlxKD4QYuQ/s+8STcxi3zXrCp0yzSq/zdWX++rKyoUM+gycY/mX7RSNfHzBfN u3Ol1T/QYwGw40FtknjQSgp+wj0KZraOEpIzTOSB+4gZhdunqn4BkAlTHuUZhggEPdR7 2NqGL7SKowGgojDgYI/m1iHJ6BUT8NQeI2o5Z7OIzsU+wB93on6IAgRpB9lP7cLxWPQL fQRw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a3si13291111ejd.741.2020.08.11.02.51.00; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728502AbgHKJr2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:47:28 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:17966 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728451AbgHKJr2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 05:47:28 -0400 IronPort-SDR: RWGSq/DlbdSV5jc4qXTRNpzilnDbVnr5Brc3ubAJl6BLBJ7i2yPkIExzcVAef9RHWKdGJwRsDc pGAAlFRHnDlw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9709"; a="154820265" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,460,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="154820265" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Aug 2020 02:47:27 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 7pAq3sgAPjEfge61/OgB2MIbTTf7TPURc6xbnHMi/fzX63ICJvi+55iMIoZMat77zfKrQl37bk iF88IMUbsMvQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,460,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="308354350" Received: from um.fi.intel.com (HELO um) ([10.237.72.57]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Aug 2020 02:47:25 -0700 From: Alexander Shishkin To: Andi Kleen Cc: peterz@infradead.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add closing sibling events' file descriptors In-Reply-To: <20200810144518.GB1448395@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20200708151635.81239-1-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <20200708151635.81239-2-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> <20200806083530.GV2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200806153205.GA1448395@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <875z9q1u3g.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> <20200810144518.GB1448395@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:47:24 +0300 Message-ID: <87364t1plf.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen writes: >> It didn't. I can't figure out what to charge on the locked memory, as >> all that memory is in kernel-side objects. It also needs to make sense > > I don't see how that makes a difference for the count. It just account > bytes. Can you elaborate? Right, but which bytes? One byte per event? That's arbitrary. sizeof(struct perf_event)? Then, probably also sizeof(struct perf_event_context). >> as iirc the default MLOCK_LIMIT is quite low, you'd hit it sooner than >> the file descriptor limit. > > For a single process? The above two structs add up to 2288 bytes on my local build. Given the default RLIMIT_MEMLOCK of 64k, that's 28 events. As opposed to ~1k events if we keep using the RLIMIT_NOFILE. Unless I'm missing your point. Regards, -- Alex