Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:44:39 -0400
From:   Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc:     Wesley Cheng <wcheng@codeaurora.org>, agross@kernel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, jackp@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 1/3] usb: dwc3: Resize TX FIFOs to meet EP bursting
 requirements
Message-ID: <20200811134439.GA331864@rowland.harvard.edu>
References: <20200624022848.7765-1-wcheng@codeaurora.org>
 <20200624022848.7765-2-wcheng@codeaurora.org>
 <87d03yptxi.fsf@kernel.org>
 <b0c8a95b-45e3-0d79-2a7c-14c8936dd551@codeaurora.org>
 <877du5pseu.fsf@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <877du5pseu.fsf@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:12:41AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> One possibility around this was suggested above, something along the
> lines of:
> 
> 	usb_gadget_ep_enable_bulk(struct usb_gadget *, struct
> 		usb_ep_alloc_desc *alloc_desc)
> 
> (please think of better names, I'm hopeless haha)

How about usb_gadget_enable_endpoints()?

Alan Stern