Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in __io_queue_deferred
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+996f91b6ec3812c48042@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
References: <00000000000035fdf505ac87b7f9@google.com>
 <76cc7c43-2ebb-180d-c2c8-912972a3f258@kernel.dk>
 <20200811140010.gigc2amchytqmrkk@steredhat>
 <504b4b08-30c1-4ca8-ab3b-c9f0b58f0cfa@kernel.dk>
 <20200811144419.blu4wufu7t4dfqin@steredhat>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <23b58871-b8b6-9f5c-2a7b-f4bade6dee6e@kernel.dk>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:45:46 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200811144419.blu4wufu7t4dfqin@steredhat>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/11/20 8:44 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 08:21:12AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 8/11/20 8:00 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:55:17AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/20 9:36 AM, syzbot wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>>>>
>>>>> HEAD commit:    449dc8c9 Merge tag 'for-v5.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/..
>>>>> git tree:       upstream
>>>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14d41e02900000
>>>>> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9d25235bf0162fbc
>>>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=996f91b6ec3812c48042
>>>>> compiler:       clang version 10.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/ c2443155a0fb245c8f17f2c1c72b6ea391e86e81)
>>>>> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=133c9006900000
>>>>> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1191cb1a900000
>>>>>
>>>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+996f91b6ec3812c48042@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, the below should fix this one.
>>>
>>> Yeah, it seems right to me, since only __io_queue_deferred() (invoked by
>>> io_commit_cqring()) can be called with 'completion_lock' held.
>>
>> Right
>>
>>> Just out of curiosity, while exploring the code I noticed that we call
>>> io_commit_cqring() always with the 'completion_lock' held, except in the
>>> io_poll_* functions.
>>>
>>> That's because then there can't be any concurrency?
>>
>> Do you mean the iopoll functions? Because we're definitely holding it
>> for the io_poll_* functions.
> 
> Right, the only one seems io_iopoll_complete().
> 
> So, IIUC, in this case we are actively polling the level below,
> so there shouldn't be any asynchronous events, is it right?

Right, that's serialized by itself.

-- 
Jens Axboe