Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp668193pxa; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:58:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7tGtytY/WSlzHbL57z+vstl/+XYrmFqJJ8Gx88VOEasEcD4B6+2KPEP/Zr4ecwwWx1fvz X-Received: by 2002:a50:d1c2:: with SMTP id i2mr26500108edg.60.1597172331207; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:58:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597172331; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZLbfoqUaWxL3NtV72PYxnasRIqEgoypINjMm0za+AJV+13Nl0drXX5m6jQHoqAjhyd yBoIUjke68Q46Fpa9nQ4N934+NpWOT8HledoeoWhFCV9paNM1lMm5zPH+7P7TG0KqLqn CCzs7g/B36zkUqkS3K8tbitI6/NG3H1mqq4SYfGDnPMQSfmlcWx2u3+y1cweOxRUrvkJ ZXo3O4pvK9UdU1gVv+YuamJtrcd+OvjKoypGo1sjz1hvMPO5KcIa/aEbRrTOvkhRBwYh xheKzg6YJiDCUB/hrijHcXvIos5n6IX66UgS3tNQTIMCJdmly0uZEWuVDfQ4WhDv85tZ xUhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=0q6pcldhorcj6nNNaBM6YAkqvTbJCDXZHgFjgiyBoRw=; b=Qs0aAjoqP3n1oiYOpNjwHQLCSGFINHCjJbfsrLhQE0be6BmcZMsHdO8KdM0Qhf9Qou ZpVXgTS3D12bWWIz2LcWBKB7KU82/W/bNkj/0TnEuOnaMFbsaBvLLOf9zDW3tzkvG/P7 9PHKSwtH59lLAPdcFVH8FFp5xV6PSkEHPpzr9DMYPK4+XFf4J7y1W07Mr5PI1HTu4oUr hCzNuPKWg5t5g7SURVF83St5fydjoPMgu0IiHP7ay3TCf//2Kbgc+/e/oFqVMJikUdDl 11WdQBy77BDjRVkgE5BMCzbzDUNHMp2lECQpCxW63dvQwca+OIWM2jcFR35f2TWllfpB VKjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ghGOWq7P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w15si15349375edl.118.2020.08.11.11.58.26; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ghGOWq7P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726127AbgHKS5k (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:57:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35740 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgHKS5i (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:57:38 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc43.google.com (mail-oo1-xc43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A189C06174A; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc43.google.com with SMTP id u28so1728064ooe.12; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:57:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0q6pcldhorcj6nNNaBM6YAkqvTbJCDXZHgFjgiyBoRw=; b=ghGOWq7PofyXLECDilGEwXF2TBqFOkBuirhuIoCCgn4iKoIymRa5RsaIlny/qqQcjZ 8OU0sfhfrIBWFFEDhrpmLJ5to5p2ByEZ82qhALHarDo0rMjQhsh1W6DmhXY/7gN+0RjR RWVSBVi8uPj98ooMOHWZuW7UFgBV2xuRRQsXLX9Qx3qkW+ZabRJEa9xVcHaQEymDf07e Phdg9weTFi6+e3B0AaE3HgSrR/Yh6ageVHO5Xt5PtitOHSQ0o+u2r/3AikpJcWD7sxSK aYtilSKf/Eg/jvXRD7n5x4BX6iz2lkB7UtiMX9g/g0+qeHhVYSACN+lO99OP1nKtSKVg FTMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0q6pcldhorcj6nNNaBM6YAkqvTbJCDXZHgFjgiyBoRw=; b=IUef4AQkTWaWlKOCfhryvYlTI/JKPHbxqJYO74y6MfyciHRoT9hheKJ/M9074zQgJ0 9hjWf1TSo8vaQLaG3xvprn2AMsqSqUkp7H3ZD4an3rNJ9LdKKRIUU7mePQoPcNseBjdm POEhEoo4npdFRn4Xn6k/XDQaBObfFbC/ZDuumDtOkf0RXxhvjxgCXn3c2vK7s5K9gYG2 hcgMONmkNgK7KL0O3vZXggtZtsQO0UiHekJnPTAGd2q0OTGHmX01WDLj0b0zJaNtNAb/ 25f9PBP80S7zXOn6LhLHTwEIg4PCeH03f0uf54BRUTpRnj4TY+06NWQ7yyF9UHOKMQPp 1X6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311CqVOIVYSwNbkTJZF3/KGw7EvoWsO1Sz9xMoC+sGRCjKvfZPV ybWkxAjQU+t5wtamX0gm90KWM8RI X-Received: by 2002:a4a:9e41:: with SMTP id w1mr6546787ook.87.1597172257572; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Davids-MacBook-Pro.local ([2601:282:803:7700:1c6:4d6a:d533:5f8b]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm4482256oiv.14.2020.08.11.11.57.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: Add VRF icmp error route lookup test To: David Miller , mjeanson@efficios.com Cc: dsahern@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <42cb74c8-9391-cf4c-9e57-7a1d464f8706@gmail.com> <20200806185121.19688-1-mjeanson@efficios.com> <20200811.102856.864544731521589077.davem@davemloft.net> From: David Ahern Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:57:35 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200811.102856.864544731521589077.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/11/20 11:28 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Michael Jeanson > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 14:51:21 -0400 > >> The objective is to check that the incoming vrf routing table is selected >> to send an ICMP error back to the source when the ttl of a packet reaches 1 >> while it is forwarded between different vrfs. >> >> The first test sends a ping with a ttl of 1 from h1 to h2 and parses the >> output of the command to check that a ttl expired error is received. >> >> [This may be flaky, I'm open to suggestions of a more robust approch.] >> >> The second test runs traceroute from h1 to h2 and parses the output to >> check for a hop on r1. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Jeanson > > This patch does not apply cleanly to the current net tree. > It is also out of context since the tests fail on current net and net-next. The tests along with the patches that fix the problem should be sent together.